AMD 45nm on AM2+ by end of 2008.Post Date: 2008-09-10 |
Post Reply
|
Author | |
skyR
Newbie Digital Storm Apprentice Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2220 |
Quote Reply
Topic: AMD 45nm on AM2+ by end of 2008. Posted: 10 Sep 2008 at 9:52am |
|
|
|
|
david5182
Groupie Joined: 13 May 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 215 |
Quote Reply Posted: 10 Sep 2008 at 10:18am |
I wonder how does the green team plan on competing with Nehalem.
|
|
Mike
Newbie Joined: 08 Sep 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 21 |
Quote Reply Posted: 10 Sep 2008 at 1:23pm |
cant wait for that :D
|
|
#TeamneXGen
#ElectrifyServers |
|
Kelly
Senior Member Digital Storm Customer Service Joined: 13 May 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 791 |
Quote Reply Posted: 10 Sep 2008 at 1:34pm |
There will be no competition with Nehalem... you'll see. Nehalem is going to be the MX series of Intel
|
|
widdlecat
DS Veteran Joined: 11 Mar 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 840 |
Quote Reply Posted: 10 Sep 2008 at 1:57pm |
If the interim 45nm quad cores are going to be up to 3GHz, perhaps the denebs will actually offer some serious OCs as have been reported. This will be good for the consumer as we can actually have a choice, rather than have the only option of Intel for performance cpus. Actually, with the newest AMD chipsets, the BE phenoms have been getting OCs over 3GHz.
I think AMD isn't going to seriously try to compete directly with Nehalem. They seem to be focusing more on performance on one side and energy saving on the other. I think they've seen how much it hurts overall business to forget the performance market. It may be small, but the rest of the market takes notice. What's the MX series of Intel, BTW? |
|
|
|
Kelly
Senior Member Digital Storm Customer Service Joined: 13 May 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 791 |
Quote Reply Posted: 10 Sep 2008 at 2:22pm |
Nvidia's MX series cards... nearly caused them to go bankrupt. They were a joke.
|
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply Posted: 10 Sep 2008 at 2:53pm |
Kelly if the chip ocs to over 4GHz just on air, how do you figure its gonna be a flop?
Intel is no nvidia |
|
Kelly
Senior Member Digital Storm Customer Service Joined: 13 May 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 791 |
Quote Reply Posted: 10 Sep 2008 at 2:57pm |
Dude, my QX9650 Oc's to 4 on air. Not much more, but I can get to 4. And stable.
But, this debate is closed. Just mark my words, Nehalem will come out and it will be out performed by the current 775's. I am now done with this topic. Edited by Kelly - 10 Sep 2008 at 3:01pm |
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply Posted: 10 Sep 2008 at 3:01pm |
Ok time will tel Don't forget you told me it tool alot of tweaking and right part to get there for you
also the only lg775 chip we have seen here go to 3.8 was HM's system with liquid cooling. I don't see no q9450 or 9550 anywhere near 3.8 without liquid cooling. so if anything is going to compete it would only be the qx9770 and possibly qx9650 which are both extreme line. I have yet to see any thing under qx9770 come close to 4.0GHz with air here. Edited by DST4ME - 10 Sep 2008 at 3:24pm |
|
Kelly
Senior Member Digital Storm Customer Service Joined: 13 May 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 791 |
Quote Reply Posted: 10 Sep 2008 at 3:46pm |
no, I told you it took me a lot of time and tweaking to get it at 4.7. Air was a simple vjump to 1.475, and changing the fsb to 1600 and the mult to 10. Not rocket science. Oh and max the fsb voltage out... (I forgot the exact amount).
Now, your argument is that Nehalem can get to 4 on air. I proved to you that my QX9650 gets there on air too. Whether or not any other CPU's (775) can or not, moot point. I was just proving your argument for Nehalem is not that big of a feat. |
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply Posted: 10 Sep 2008 at 3:56pm |
my argument is that current systems can't reach 4.0GHz with only air, yours is the only one we know of on this forum. does anybody here have a system from DS that came close to 4.GHz with air and was not an extreme chip? not that I know of.
I don't see how just because you did what happens to every other person is a moot point? Nehalem will OC better then penryn, with air or liquid, thats my argument, and it is a big feat. the Mainstream desktop for Nehalem starts at 2.66GHz and will cost less. now you think a penryn q9450 at 2.66GHz is gonna out perform or have the same results as a Nehalem Mainstream desktop chip at 2.66GHz? go ahead but you are dead wrong, the where we send out current chip with liquid cooling at 3.2 or 3.4, Nehalem will be able to provide that customer the same speed with air and higher speeds with liquid. thats my argument, the customer will pay less and get more speed. I guarantold you that, now sit back and watch. |
|
Kelly
Senior Member Digital Storm Customer Service Joined: 13 May 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 791 |
Quote Reply Posted: 10 Sep 2008 at 4:03pm |
no one here would have a system from us because we don't push systems that high. This is my system that I built on my own. Not from DS.
Now take this argument to Xtremesystems.org... there are techs there with actual results. |
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply Posted: 10 Sep 2008 at 4:07pm |
thats my argument, with nehalem you don't need to puch that hard and our customers here will get better speeds then they are with penryn.
if you want to go to XS we can but then first we would need nehalem chips to compare won't we |
|
Post Reply |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |