280 sli versus 260 sliPost Date: 2008-11-20 |
Post Reply
|
Author | |
Harry
Groupie Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 190 |
Quote Reply
Topic: 280 sli versus 260 sli Posted: 20 Nov 2008 at 3:21pm |
I need to bug everyone again. Putting the finishing touches on my i7 system. Holly smokes now over 5 large.
I just can't see much of a difference between them. Could save a couple of hundred with the 260 sli. Will be using 24" display. Gamer unit.
Edited by Harry - 20 Nov 2008 at 3:21pm |
|
Cool Master HAF 932
Core i7 965 DSO OC Water cooled CPU ASUS Rampage II Extreme 6 GB DDR3 1600 OCZ 1000 W Corsair HX GTX 470 300 GB Raptor tera 7200rpm Windows 7 |
|
skyR
Newbie Digital Storm Apprentice Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2220 |
Quote Reply Posted: 20 Nov 2008 at 3:54pm |
GTX 260 core 216 SLI > GTX 280 SLI
|
|
|
|
Harry
Groupie Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 190 |
Quote Reply Posted: 20 Nov 2008 at 4:06pm |
Sorry not too computer smart. What does that mean.
|
|
Cool Master HAF 932
Core i7 965 DSO OC Water cooled CPU ASUS Rampage II Extreme 6 GB DDR3 1600 OCZ 1000 W Corsair HX GTX 470 300 GB Raptor tera 7200rpm Windows 7 |
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply Posted: 20 Nov 2008 at 4:11pm |
If you get the gtx 260 that have the 216 core, they will out perfome 280 gtx
Edited by DST4ME - 20 Nov 2008 at 4:11pm |
|
Harry
Groupie Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 190 |
Quote Reply Posted: 20 Nov 2008 at 10:18pm |
Thank you both.
Harry
|
|
Cool Master HAF 932
Core i7 965 DSO OC Water cooled CPU ASUS Rampage II Extreme 6 GB DDR3 1600 OCZ 1000 W Corsair HX GTX 470 300 GB Raptor tera 7200rpm Windows 7 |
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply Posted: 20 Nov 2008 at 10:26pm |
My pleasure
|
|
Axel Daemon
Senior Member Joined: 21 Aug 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 623 |
Quote Reply Posted: 21 Nov 2008 at 12:27am |
Woah really? Even in a Triple SLI the 260 216 is better than 280?
If you're talking about price:performance ratio then I'd understand. Edited by Axel Daemon - 21 Nov 2008 at 12:29am |
|
"People believe in people who believe in others."
|
|
Rad!caL
Groupie Joined: 16 Nov 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 292 |
Quote Reply Posted: 21 Nov 2008 at 2:19am |
The 216 is just a few FPS behind the 280 in most benchmarks. With a little overclocking it and top it.
|
|
Post Reply |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |