any suggestions on my buildPost Date: 2008-04-03 |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
dave
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Topic: any suggestions on my buildPosted: 03 Apr 2008 at 10:45pm |
|
this is my 2nd post and want to thank people for their advice
i have a DS sysyem now and DS is GREAT! been studying cpu and graphic cards reviews till im going crazy .i would be grateful to all input. i play in
1200x1080 .1 monitor which would be a 22 inch .how this build look
after so much research i finally at this point and my wife is going crazy
with me talking about it :) so i will be ordering by weeks end .
GO DS!!!! pleasant surprize with them 4 years ago and now hooked for life! anyone that buys elsewhere is a FOOL!
Case: Digital Storm 850Si (Black Anodized Aluminum Finish)
Power Supply: 750W Corsair HX (Dual SLI Compatible) (Silent Edition) Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 3.00GHz (1333MHz Front Side Bus) (6MB Cache) Motherboard: nVidia 780i Core 2 Quad (nForce 780i SLI) Memory: 4GB DDR2 Corsair at 1066MHz Dominator DHX (Extreme-Performance) Floppy / Card: 1.44MB Floppy (Black Edition) Hard Drive 1: 320GB Western Digital (16MB Cache) (7200 RPM) (SATA) Hard Drive 2: - No Thanks Raid Option: - No Thanks Hard Drive 3: - No Thanks Optical Drive 1: DVD-ROM/CD-ROM (DVD Reader 16x / CD Reader 40x) Optical Drive 2: DVD±R/RW/CD-R/RW (DVD Writer 20x / CD-Writer 48x) (LightScribe Edition) Network Card: High Speed Network Port (Supports High-Speed Cable / DSL / Network Connections) Video Card: nVidia GeForce 9800GTX 512MB TV Tuner: - No Thanks Sound Card: Motherboard Multi-Channel High Definition Audio Physics Card: - No Thanks Cooling: Air Cooled Stage 3 WindTunnel (Copper Heatpipe Heatsink & Zalman Case Fans) Case Lighting: Blizzard Internal Lighting (Blue Edition) (Cold Cathode Tubes) Round Cables: Enhanced Interior Air Flow (Optical Drive & Floppy Cables (Red Cables) User Manual: Personalized Platinum Digital Storm Binder (Includes Paperwork/Benchmarks/CDs/Manuals) Overclock Processor: - No Thanks, Please do not overclock my processor Overclock Video Card: - No Thanks, Please do not overclock my video card(s) Overclock Memory: - No Thanks, Please do not overclock my memory Tweak Windows: - No Thanks, Please do not tweak the services on the operating system Windows OS: Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium Restore Kit: Digital Storm Specialized Recovery System (DVD Image Based) Protection: - No Thanks Office: - No Thanks Benchmarking: - No Thanks Pre-Install Game: - No Thanks LCD Display: - No Thanks Surge Shield: - No Thanks Speakers: - No Thanks Keyboard: - No Thanks Mouse: - No Thanks Warranty: 3 Year Platinum Care Extended Parts & Labor Warranty Support: Lifetime Toll-Free Platinum Care Technical Support > |
|
![]() |
|
Tyler Lowe
Newbie
Joined: 14 May 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 0 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 Apr 2008 at 12:06am |
|
If you have 4GB of RAM installed, you will want to select the 64 bit edition of Vista. Other than that, looks good.
|
|
![]() |
|
Slicer
Groupie
Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 78 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 Apr 2008 at 10:49am |
Question on this statement: Why is that? Could you not run the 32-bit and not have Vista using up so much of your ram capabilities by having 4 gigs? Doesn't the 64 bit which requires 4gb use up more RAM than having 4 GB Ram operating the 32 bit version leaving the spare Ram to work on extra processes?
I'm just a noob so probably not thinking clearly but I dont see why you cant run 4gb of ram on the 32 bit os?
|
|
![]() |
|
Tyler Lowe
Newbie
Joined: 14 May 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 0 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 Apr 2008 at 12:00pm |
|
Because the 32 bit version of Vista can only use a little under 3GB of that RAM. 64 bit does *not* "require" 4GB of RAM, 64 bit is required to gain the ability to address 4 GB of RAM.
As to why? because... 2^32= 4294967296 4294967296=4GB That is the limit of addresses in a 32 bit operating system. This is to include the addresses the operating system itself needs to inhabit, the addresses for all physical hardware, and all memory on that hardware. By the time you get done ripping chunks of addresses away for those things, the typical user is going to be looking at between 2.5GB and 2.85GB of addresses remaining for system RAM. Microsoft apparently got tired of answering the phone calls and emails from people demanding to know why, if their motherboard supports 4GB of RAM, Vista 32bit won't recognize it. So instead of reporting how much RAM your system can actually use, they now have the system page display how much RAM is installed. 2^32 hasn't changed, and neither has the capability of any 32 bit OS to address RAM, regardless of what that last patch to Vista would have us believe. |
|
![]() |
|
Slicer
Groupie
Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 78 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 Apr 2008 at 12:17pm |
|
Thanks Tyler, that helped me fix my configuration as well.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum |