Gaming Rig ConfigurationPost Date: 2011-09-11 |
Post Reply
|
Page 123> |
Author | ||
joshxt
Newbie Joined: 10 Sep 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 30 |
Quote Reply
Topic: Gaming Rig Configuration Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 12:08am |
|
Hello DS members. I'm new here and preparing to order my DS rig. I'm an avid gamer. From fps to mmorpg to strategy. I play it all. Preferably on max settings. I will be all over BF3, Diablo 3, SKYRIM, Dead Island, and just about any other new release. Youtube as well.. casual internet browsing. $$$ is tight as im a college student, and I'd prefer to keep it below $1.8k if possible. Can't go any higher than that really. Out of this rig there is only one thing I'm unsure of and that is the wireless internet card. I currently own a Linksys AE1000 Wireless Adapter(sheesh now that im reading reviews on it I wish I wouldve done my research). Anyway, should I stick with this or go with the one in my DS config? Like I said im an extreme gamer. Thanks for your time and input.
-Josh Specifications: Chassis Model: Special Deal Hot Seller - Cooler Master 942 HAF X Exterior Finish: - Standard Factory Finish Trim Accents: - Standard Factory Finish Processor: Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30GHz (Unlocked CPU for Extreme Overclocking) (Quad Core) Motherboard: ASUS P8P67 (Intel P67 Chipset) (Features USB 3.0 and SATA 6Gb/s) System Memory: 8GB DDR3 1600MHz Digital Storm Certified Performance Series (Highly Recommended) (Hand Tested) <b></b> Power Supply: 800W Corsair GS (Dual SLI Compatible) <b></b> Expansion Bay: - No Thanks Hard Drive Set 1: Operating System: 1x (1TB Western Digital Caviar (7200 RPM) (64MB Cache) (Model: Black Edition) <b></b> Set 1 Raid Options: - No Thanks Hard Drive Set 2: Multimedia\Data: - No Thanks Hard Drive Set 3: Backup\Misc.: - No Thanks Optical Drive 1: DVD-R/RW/CD-R/RW (DVD Writer 24x / CD-Writer 48x) Optical Drive 2: - No Thanks Internet Access: Wireless PCI-E 802.11n Up to 300Mbps (Supports 802.11n/g/b) (Model: ASUS PCE-N15) <b></b> Video Card: 2x SLI Dual (NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 1GB (PhysX) (EVGA SuperClocked 01G-P3-1372-TR) Add-on Card: - No Thanks Sound Card: Integrated Motherboard Audio Extreme Cooling: AIR: Stage 2: Corsair A70 Dual 120mm Fans High Performance Cooler <b></b> H20 Tube Color:- Not Applicable, I do not have a FrostChill or Sub-Zero LCS Cooling System Selected Chassis Airflow: Standard Factory Chassis Fans Internal Lighting: - No Thanks Enhancements: - No Thanks Chassis Mods: - No Thanks Noise Reduction: - No Thanks Boost Processor: FREE: Overclock the processor between 3.6GHz to 3.9GHz Boost Video Card: - No Thanks, Please do not overclock my video card(s) Boost Memory: - No Thanks, Please do not overclock my memory Boost OS: FREE: Yes, Disable and tweak all of the non-crucial services on the operating system <b></b> Windows OS: Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium (64-Bit Edition) Recovery Tools: Windows Recovery Toolkit (Bundled with Windows 7 CD) Virus Protection: - No Thanks Office: - No Thanks Benchmarking: - No Thanks Install/Test Game: - No Thanks Display: - No Thanks Surge Shield: - No Thanks Speakers: - No Thanks Keyboard: - No Thanks Mouse: - No Thanks External Storage: - No Thanks Exclusive T-Shirt: - No Thanks Priority Build: - No Thanks, Ship Within 5-15 Business Days After Order Is Successfully Processed Warranty: Life-time Expert Customer Care with 3 Year Limited Warranty Ticket Number: 595745 Total Price with Instant Savings: $1,768.00 |
||
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 12:10am | |
What res you gonna be gaming at? depending on your res you gonna want better cards than the 460.
|
||
joshxt
Newbie Joined: 10 Sep 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 30 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 12:15am | |
Just about to mention that sorry. 1920x1080.
A benchmark done on benchmarkreviews.com helped me come to the decision on 460s sli. They outperformed every card(single) to date excluding the 590 as it was not out yet. |
||
Vek17
Newbie Joined: 10 Sep 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 26 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 12:17am | |
You should be just fine with those cards then, I have a single overclocked Gtx460 and I can max everything I have thrown at it (Save the witcher 2 which is max except ubersampling) with 75+ FPS @1440x900
|
||
joshxt
Newbie Joined: 10 Sep 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 30 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 12:20am | |
Good to know. Any other recommendations? Whatever we end up with at the end of this thread is what Im ordering.
|
||
Vek17
Newbie Joined: 10 Sep 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 26 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 12:27am | |
I don't see anything jumping out at me, but I'd wait for a few others to look at it.
|
||
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 12:40am | |
That is bad advise, for bf3 sli 460 will not cut it, also think about future performance.
vek17 is new on the forum and I'm not sure where he is getting his info, I do not agree with most of what he is saying if you want to listen to him go ahead just know most of us will not agree with his comments. the 590 is out but its a horrible idea, sli 570 will do better then 590, also 590 is a single card but its internal sli, which is where its problems begin. never go just by one review site, and just by one review. |
||
Vek17
Newbie Joined: 10 Sep 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 26 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 12:48am | |
...again don't judge performance for software or hardware yet to be released. You also failed to read he can't go higher the 1.8k. 2 Gtx 570's cost about $660 just for the cards alone (as in from a vender and not built into a machine). If he would want to put that into a computer he would have to build it himself as the price here would not fit his budget. I personally believe 2 460's would perform just fine especially if the scaling is decent. If he needs more power, the 460 overclocks VERY well.
Recommended system requirements for Battlefield 3
|
||
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 12:52am | |
Vek17 your info is false please stop using recommended requierments and nvidia's own bloated benches to tell poor unsuspecting people what to do.
every body know that the Recommended system requirements is not what is really needed: I can bring benchmark after benchmark that show the 460 getting 35 fps at 1900 x 1200 with highest settings Battlefield Bad Company 2 (DX11) DirectX 11 enabled 8x Multi-sample Anti aliasing 16 Anisotropic filtering All image quality settings enabled at maximum so if the recommended system requierments are correct, then how come 34fps average is what we endup with? if you take the time to read around you will see everybody that knows what they are talking about says that bf3 is gonna need much more gpu power to run than bf2. Edited by DST4ME - 11 Sep 2011 at 12:57am |
||
Vek17
Newbie Joined: 10 Sep 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 26 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 1:00am | |
...okay wrong resolution first off and I am not justifying what I'm saying here with Nvida statements but with experience with this card. What info here is false as I'd like to correct it if that is the case. This is also not a discussion for a single 460 but 2 in SLI which far exceeds one.
Also benchmarks for BF:BC2 on SLI 460's @1900x1200 http://www.techspot.com/review/309-geforce-gtx-460-sli-performance/page5.html http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=593&Itemid=72&limit=1&limitstart=9 And again with the lower end version of the 460: http://www.guru3d.com/article/geforce-gtx-460-sli-review/6 Edited by Vek17 - 11 Sep 2011 at 1:06am |
||
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 1:06am | |
techspot is not a good place for reviews we don't use most of their reviews, same with toms, show me a creditable site, I see you edited your post, only good site you have up there now after your edit is guru3d.
second yes we are talking sli 460s however if sli 460 barely gets 60fps average then in bf3 its gonna be crying, we have already seen bf3 make a 580 cry in a preview from them. the bad info you have is from the sources you are using, you need to start using creditable sites. also when you recommend parts to people, keep in mind people use their pcs for more then today and tomorrow, sli 460 is not gonna do great at all in a year or so, games are just gonna get heavier, look at sli 460 with metro, it can't go crap. so recommending parts to people is not as easy as looking at one benchmark and requierments, there is a lot more that go into it. only good site you have up there now after your edit is guru3d. You do know everything you find and post I already know right? if I didn't I would not be able to help people here, I would be torn to pieces by other members, you are lucky the others are not here. Edited by DST4ME - 11 Sep 2011 at 1:10am |
||
Vek17
Newbie Joined: 10 Sep 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 26 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 1:12am | |
When recommending parts you also have to consider budgets, and 2 460's is just slightly more expensive then a 570.
What sites do you consider credible? In my opinion based primarily on my experience, 2 460's would work quite well for what is being asked (as he is going to be in 1080p). I am one person and people are allowed to disagree with me, but the 460 SLI has one of the best price performances on the market (last time I checked). I do not have an uber computer, but I have a very good price/performance computer which is what this person seems to be asking. In my experience you can get alot more out of hardware then people think. I don't know your background or your experience with the hardware and I am not trying to discredit you. I am simply trying to save someone money and still satisfy what they are asking for. Edited by Vek17 - 11 Sep 2011 at 1:15am |
||
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 1:19am | |
last time you checked was a long ago, what does sli 460 being better then single 570 have to do with it? for 1900 x 1200 res, and fps games and some mmos, we recommend sli 570.
I'm providing info on what he needs then he can respond about his budget and etc. I rarely pass out my opinion here, most of the info I provide are facts. I know all the benchmarks for different cards and have been here doing this for 3 years now ( see under my avatar, been doing this since 2008 here, been doing longer but other places) and in my experience, 460 sli might be good for some games this year, next year and year after that it won't be and for games like bf3 it won't be enough this year. Edited by DST4ME - 11 Sep 2011 at 1:21am |
||
Vek17
Newbie Joined: 10 Sep 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 26 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 1:23am | |
He has mentioned his budget and I don't think SLI 570's fit into that. I am suggesting SLI 460's as a reasonable alternative. Obviously 570's are preferable but they are also more costly. |
||
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 1:26am | |
Again I'm telling him what he needs and waiting for his response. me and him can discuss his budget from there. there is nothing reasonable about sli 460 and maxing out bf3. most likley he will say he will lower the settings but its important that he knows now before he buys, that he will come up short for games like bf3 and most games to come. I'm sure he does not appreciate being told that sli 460 will run bf3 maxed out with good aa, when it won't, and then find out when he goes to play, best he knows it now. Also for $20 more he can have sli 560 which perform much better then sli 460. in bf3 at 1900 x 1200 sli 460 gets 60fps, sli 560 gets 80fps, that is more reasonable. Edited by DST4ME - 11 Sep 2011 at 1:40am |
||
RiceEatin2000GT
DS Veteran Joined: 02 Oct 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1699 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 1:39am | |
i dont want to argue but ill put my opinion in here. Since his resolution is 1920x1080 460's wont cut it if hes looking to play future games like bf3. I just glanced over the thread but if his budget allows 570's in SLI would be a better choice.
|
||
|
||
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 1:40am | |
For $20 more he can have sli 560 which perform much better then sli 460. in bf2 at 1900 x 1200 sli 460 gets 60fps, sli 560 gets 80fps, that is more reasonable.
Edited by DST4ME - 11 Sep 2011 at 1:40am |
||
RiceEatin2000GT
DS Veteran Joined: 02 Oct 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1699 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 1:42am | |
was gonna mention that also |
||
|
||
Vek17
Newbie Joined: 10 Sep 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 26 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 1:44am | |
Please at least wait until the Beta goes live before making performance statements as a fact as everything available now is entirely speculation based on vague info. You said you primarily provide facts, but providing facts about unreleased games is impossible. I am sure your input is appreciated and helpful, but please don't state opinion as fact.
I have only attempted to offer insight about the 460, a card I have a lot of experience with and feel have at least some valid input. I take it that input is unwanted so I will stop. Good luck with your computer joshxt, hope it does what you want at a price you find resonable. |
||
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 1:47am | |
We are basing it on what we have seen from the game and the game makers. We happen to know its gonna have a different engine and its gonna need more gpu power.
thats a fact. Edited by DST4ME - 11 Sep 2011 at 1:49am |
||
joshxt
Newbie Joined: 10 Sep 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 30 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 3:19am | |
Thanks Vek17. I appreciate your input. I agree that the price/performance ratio on the 460s is fantastic. |
||
joshxt
Newbie Joined: 10 Sep 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 30 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 3:22am | |
With all of this information here I guess my question would be.. why is it when I go to nvidia SLI computers on this site the 460s are the recommended choice? Why not have them default with 560s? Is the 5 series reliable? I spoke to an MSI tech support recently and he shot down the idea of a 5 series card saying I'd have many problems with it in the future as they are fairly new and unreliable. DST4ME, is it possible that I can get the build ive posted and replace the 460s with 560s for only $20 more? If so is this something youd suggest I do? How much of a performance increase will I see if I do this and will the machine be stable?
|
||
joshxt
Newbie Joined: 10 Sep 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 30 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 3:29am | |
No one has commented on my wireless network situation. Linksys AE1000 vs the options listed with DS. Anyone?
ALSO, ive read that the 560 TI is far superior to the 560 itself. Would that be something to consider? Still wondering if I should question the stability of the 5 series as opposed to the 4. I'll check back to this thread in the morning. |
||
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 3:34am | |
the 560 on the average can give you 20fsp more, with that in mind it would be crazy to go with sli 460 over 560.
Don't trust everybody you talk to, first msi tech talks about msi products, second that msi tech sounds like he does not know sh*t. go post a topic in the general section and ask all the 570580/560 owners to post what they think about their cards and if they think its a headache, cause I can tell you they are not, now if you don't know what you are doing or have the cards oced too high, then yes any card will go bad in those scenario, you saw RiceEatin2000GT post a few posts up, look at his sig, he has sli 570 its been 6 month now, working great, he just posted an update about it in his review thread, he will tell you himself they are great and if you read his post in this thread, you will see he recommended sli 570, so there is nothing wrong with 570 gtx, but then again I would not recommend you get msi version of anything.
the config you posted can't do sli, the mobo you have does not support sli. |
||
Vek17
Newbie Joined: 10 Sep 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 26 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 4:00am | |
How well does the 560 OC out of curiosity?
|
||
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 4:58am | |
It can come close to 570 if you push it.
|
||
Vek17
Newbie Joined: 10 Sep 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 26 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 5:20am | |
I suppose that makes sense. 460 OC = 560 and 560 OC =570
That overclock is stable with decent temps? (as in below 75c) Edited by Vek17 - 11 Sep 2011 at 5:48am |
||
goldendarko
Newbie Joined: 06 Sep 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 47 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 5:40am | |
How does sli 570 do if overclocked? Would you recommend it?
|
||
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 6:02am | |
OCing a card can cause issues down the road and most times oced cards die sooner then stock cards, the best thing to do is to get the card you need, unless budget is absolute and strict, in which case here for example for 1900 x 1200 res you want sli 570, anything more is a waste at that res, very rarely will you see us recommend 580 or sli 580, so if you can't get 570 for that res then you try for 560ti, if that does not work you go for the 560, if that does not work then you are pretty much sh*t out of luck lol
so in short we never recommend oced cards, or ocing your card unless you have to. just to be clear, getting anything more then sli 570 for 1900 x 1200 res is like pouring 2 liters of water in a one liter bottle. @Vek17, you can't compare your temps with others and vise versa, temps all depend on room temp, case airflow/temp, those are different for everybody. stable temps max at 85c, below that is perfectly fine, the lower the better of course, above 85c is not acceptable even tho the gpu is designed to run hotter then 85c, everybody draws the line at 85c, my personal like is 80c, but we all do that so that we are not pushing the card at max temps, but you can run it at max temps, and it will still be covered under warranty. so to answer your question, if the room temp is good and case airflow and temps are good, yes the load temps will be lower then 85c with proper fan profile. Edited by DST4ME - 11 Sep 2011 at 6:05am |
||
Vek17
Newbie Joined: 10 Sep 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 26 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 6:10am | |
The lower you OC the better, if you can gt away with no OC then by all means don't OC the card. I only run an OC for the witcher 2 on my 460 which helps alot. I'm personally not all that worried about the cards longevity beyond a year from now as I intend to upgrade when the next generation of Nvidia and AMD cards release as the price on current cards should drop. Plus I got this card for a steal so losing it isn't a huge loss.That being said OCing cards does kill them faster so if you want your cards to last the longest keep them at stock.
Edited by Vek17 - 11 Sep 2011 at 6:12am |
||
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 6:20am | |
Well here what we do is assume the person needs to keep the gpus for at least 2 years, specially when they are on a tight budget.
otherwise personally all my 4 cards are oced, and just like you I don't care for 2 reasons: 1. I got 5 year part warranty for my system. 2. even of the warranty was not there I wouldn't care if I had to replace them. but here we can't assume everybody is like us, for me I fold with my gpus so every little bit of oc make a good difference there, but too much of nothing is good so I don't have them oced high, they are like at 750 at this time, I can run them at 830 stable with load temps of around 70c, but the card would be getting pushed and I don't like pushing things like that, so I have them at 750, its a good mid ground for me. |
||
joshxt
Newbie Joined: 10 Sep 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 30 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 10:22am | |
Oh sheesh. I wasn't aware of that. I assumed DS labeled a configuration as nvidia sli it'd be capable of sli. Ugh. Anyway, what board would you suggest? I'm already going over budget as it is. |
||
Alex
Admin Group Digital Storm Supervisor Joined: 04 Jun 2012 Online Status: Offline Posts: 16314 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 1:23pm | |
It does if you leave it as the default configuration.
|
||
joshxt
Newbie Joined: 10 Sep 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 30 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 3:08pm | |
The Asus p8p67 is the default mobo on this nvidia sli build. I'm assuming that supports sli. Is that correct? Also I'm looking at the price difference to sli 560 ti would be +71 but adding a single 580 superclocked would be +79. Would that be a better choice? Would it be a hassle to sli in the future or should I stick with 560 ti sli? |
||
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Sep 2011 at 3:25pm | |
Alex the p8p67 does not support sli you thinking of something else?
here are the specs from asus: It only supports cf, also in cf you endup with one pci lane being x4 which is horrible. to sli 580 you need a 1050Hx psu. sli 560 out performs single 580/570. but as I have mentioned a few times, your best bet for that res is 570 sli, or single 570 now and then you add a second 570 within a year or so. adding gpu is easy. Edited by DST4ME - 11 Sep 2011 at 3:27pm |
||
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum |