FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

HAF 932 or HailStorm?

Post Date: 2009-09-23
 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
BrandonTheGamer View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 04 Sep 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 25 		  Quote BrandonTheGamer Quote  Post ReplyReply bullet Topic: HAF 932 or HailStorm?
    Posted: 23 Sep 2009 at 10:39am
Which would be a better choice in your opinion? HailStorm is available tomorrow at DS and I was wondering everyone's opinion on which case is a better choice.
Back to Top
DST4ME View Drop Down
DS ELITE
DS ELITE

Email address used to purchase matched with forums account email.

Joined: 14 Apr 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 36758 		  Quote DST4ME Quote  Post ReplyReply bullet Posted: 23 Sep 2009 at 2:06pm
It all depends on your needs and cooling.

if you are going air cooling on gpus, then haf is best, cause it has the best airflow.

if you going LC on cpu/gpu then hailstorm is a great choice.

Nvidia Drivers----AMD Drivers
Back to Top
Techkai View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie

Email address used to purchase matched with forums account email.

Joined: 03 Sep 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 52 		  Quote Techkai Quote  Post ReplyReply bullet Posted: 23 Sep 2009 at 4:28pm
Hailstorm is huge! I would only know cause I had the silverstone raven case from DS one time and had both cpu and gpu LC. But a 24-25-11 computer was completely impractical and inefficient as it could not fit under my computer desk (to tall),ran hot,80C inside case and when I finally had to mail it back for refund it would not fit in nissan sentra trunk even with back seats down and I can fit a queen mattress with frame  no prob but a 24-25-11 computer in box is just huge. If I were you I would get a Haf 932 it does everything a Hailstorm can do but better when to comes to cooling  and is smaller and more mobile Evil%20Smile

Edited by Techkai - 23 Sep 2009 at 4:51pm
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.03125 seconds.