FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

HOWTO: Overclock C2D Quads and C2D Duals - A Guide

Post Date: 2007-08-05

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Kelly View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Digital Storm Customer Service


Joined: 13 May 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 791
  Quote Kelly Quote  Post ReplyReply bullet Topic: HOWTO: Overclock C2D Quads and C2D Duals - A Guide
    Posted: 05 Aug 2007 at 12:27pm
Borrowed from: http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1198647
This was written by graysky
I wrote this guide with the newbie in mind, so please don't reply criticizing it for being too simplistic -- it's this way by design.

For reference, I have a Q6600 on an Asus P5B-Deluxe. I’m running @ 9x333 with a vcore of 1.2625v. It’s cooled with an Ultra-120 Extreme.

I wrote this guide based on overclocking this quad core chip to run stable with minimized heat output. The steps for overclocking don’t really care if you have a C2D Quad, C2D Dual, or any type of modern
processor really. Contained in the thread are the settings I’m using to push the Q6600 to 3.01 GHz (9x333). If you’d rather shoot for a higher overclock, more power to ya. You can apply the same steps regardless of the numbers you chose. Also, I take no responsibility for what you do with the information in this guide. Overclock your hardware at your own risk.

Pre-overclocking checklist

Before you think about overclocking your system, you'll need to be sure you're using quality parts that can handle the increased stresses. I don't want to reinvent the wheel here, so I'm going to just copy/paste out of wusy's Core2Duo Overlocking Guide. These are just general hardware guidelines... just because you don't see something in these lists, doesn't mean it won't work.

Motherboards
Wusy recommends the following motherboards:
Quote:
-abit AW9D series (975X)
-ASUS P5W DH series (975X)
-DFI Infinity or LANParty 975X/G
-abit AB9 series
-ASUS P5B* Deluxe/WiFi-AP (965P)
-Gigabyte 965P-DS3 or DS4 or DQ6
*P5B vanilla is not recommended
**nForce590/570 Intel Edition based motherboard will not work with this guide nor recommended for overclocking**
There are others boards he didn’t include on his list that are too numerous to mention and with the recent launch (recent as of the time I wrote this guide June/’07) of the Bearlake chipsets, I’m sure the list will continue to grow. Just because you don’t see your specific board listed here doesn’t mean it won’t overclock well.

Cooling
Cooling is very important since you're asking the system to produce more heat than it's designed to produce. A quad core chip will produce twice the heat of a dual core chip, so if you're using the Intel Stock HSF, you'll probably want to upgrade to something better. Here is wusy's list of good heat sinks:

Quote:
-Scythe Infinity
-Scythe Ninja Plus
-Scythe Mine
-Tuniq Tower 120
-Thermalright Ultra-120 or SI-128 or SI-120
-Noctua NH-U12
-Thermaltake Big Typhoon
-Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro
-Zalman CNPS CNPS9500AT
-Zalman CNPS 7700AlCu or 7700Cu
Here is a more recent list of HS’s that have actually been reviewed and ranked based on performance.

Memory
You will need memory that's designed to handle increased FSB values. There are tons of different options out there. Again, here's wusy's list:

Quote:
-DDR2-667 4-4-4-xx (good for ~400Mhz)
-DDR2-800 5-5-5-xx (good for ~410Mhz)
-DDR2-800 4-4-4-xx (good for 500Mhz+) ->Best for E6300/E6400
-DDR2-1066 5-5-5-xx (good for 530Mhz+)
-Or any other RAM of the above mentioned speed that has even lower timings
The 667, 800, or 1066 refer to the speed of the FSB (front side bus in MHz) for which it's rated. It's a little more complicated... these are DDR2 type so you divide those numbers by 2. So you'll get 667/2 = 333 MHz; 800/2 = 400 MHz; and 1066/2 = 533 MHz. The numbers after that are the main timings. In general, the lower these numbers are, the faster the memory. This isn’t entirely true in my experience, but feel free to test them for yourself.

Power Supply

There are really two major factors to consider when selecting a power supply: 1) Quality of the PSU and 2) Power output. I don’t have the expertise to write up this selection of the guide, so I’ll point you to this nice list written by perkam to use as a guide. mpilchfamily has written a very good tutorial on power supplies you might want to read if you want an in depth discussion.

There is a great article on power consumption over at Tom's Hardware dot com that I suggest you read at your leisure. I distilled out some highlights to underscore how much power systems really use:

Quote:
Component Best Case Worst Case
Power Supply 5-15 W 40-60 W
Motherboard 10-15 W 30-50 W
Processor 12-30 W 60-120 W
RAM 5-15 W 30-50 W
Hard Drive 3-5 W (2.5") 10-15 W (3.5")
Graphics Card (single) 3-10 W (integrated) 25-180 W (PCI Express)
Total 38-90 W 195-475 W
So you can see that depending on the hardware specs, your system power requirements can approach 500 W.

Overlocking a Quad (or dual) Core Chip

Before you start, read your motherboard manual. Know how to reset your BIOS in the event that you are too aggressive in your CPU settings and it doesn't complete a POST (Power On Self Test, that beep when you first turn the machine on and it starts up means you passed the POST). Some motherboards reset automatically if you switch off the power supply for 30 seconds or so. Others require you to move a jumper to reset them.

First thing you want to do is decide on an overclocked CPU speed. For reference, here are the stock speeds for the 3 quads Intel sells at the time I wrote this guide (June/'07):

Q6600 = 2.40 GHz
QX6700 = 2.66 GHz
QX6800 = 2.93 GHz

I'm running my Q6600 at 9x333=3.01 GHz (25 % over factory) but I have read verified results of this chip running at 9x401=3.61 GHz when cooled with water. Every chip is different... you might be an unlucky owner of a chip that just doesn’t overclock very high at all. I count myself in the lucky category since my chip runs stable at this speed without overheating or using too much voltage. You can shoot for higher numbers, but you'll probably need water cooling to manage the temps you'll produce if you go much faster. I can also run stable @ 3.2 GHz cooled on air, but that's only 200 MHz (7 %) faster than 3.01 GHz, and it requires more voltage which puts out more heat. It just isn’t worth it to me.

Enter your BIOS to tweak some settings. You'll go back in and find more aggressive ones later on. For now, you want to verify you can successfully POST, and verify that your system can run stable at the settings you've selected.

The basic formula you need to know for overclocking is this:

Code:
CPU Speed = FSB x CPUM
where FSB is the front side bus and CPUM is the CPU Multiplier.
Example: The Q6600 runs at a factory setting of 2.40 GHz. That's the product of a 9x multiplier and a 266 MHz FSB (quad pumped it's 1066 MHz but we're not quad pumping these numbers). So CPU Speed = 9 x 266 which is 2,394 MHz or 2.40 GHz. The Q6600 has a "locked" multiplier, meaning it can't go above 9 like the QX6700/6800 can (they are both unlocked). So the only way to increase the CPU Speed is by raising the FSB.

That's the basic long and short of it. It's more complicated because as you increase the FSB, you'll also need to increase the core voltage (vcore) which is the actual juice going to the processor. As well, you may have to increase the other voltages on the board like: memory, FSB, NB, SB, ICH chipset. Don't worry about that for now. The board can manage these automatically which is what you should do initially. When you finally decide on an overclock number, you'll want to go back and minimize your voltages to minimize your heat production. We'll get into this later.

For now, look for some settings in your BIOS. Not all boards are the same. The following terms/pics are taken from a P5B-Del; other manufactures will likely have their own names for these settings. You're on your own to figure them out (shouldn't be that tough). Also, sorry for the sh*t quality images. I have no idea how to effectively photograph a computer monitor. I just used a cheap p&s camera with the lights off. You can still read them.

First thing you want to do is change a few settings, I'll take them in order:



Modify Ratio Support - disabled, but you can if you want to select a different multiplier. For the Q6600, 9x is the highest as I said. If you enable this, you can select a lower one if you want, some people think a lower multiplier and a higher FSB is better. For example: 9x333 = 3.01 GHz and so does 8x375. I'll show you later that doing this in my experience only gives you faster synthetic benchmarks; real applications don't go any faster and all you're doing is producing more heat by doing this.

C1E - disable initially, enable later on and see if the system remains stable. This is a power savings option.

Max CPUID value limit – disable unless you’re running an older O/S like Windows NT.

Vanderpool – disable unless you’re running VMWare; this option allows you to run multiple O/S’s on the same machine by creating virtual machines.

CPU TM function – enable. Option affects CPU protection/throttle management to help you when you don’t realize you’re pushing your chip too hard.

Execute Disable Bit - enable. XP has a setting to help with virus protection and requires this set to enable.

PECI – disable or enable. This affects how your DTS (Digital Thermal Sensors) report the core temps of your CPU. I have mine enabled and have read several posts now that suggest having it enabled does indeed give more accurate core temps. I can’t say if you want it on or off in your system.

SpeedStep - disable initially, enable later on and see if the system remains stable. This is a power savings option.

C1E and Speedstep are both power savings options as mentioned above. Many guides tell you to disable them. I think initially you should, but once you are fine tuning your O/C, go ahead and switch them back on and see if your system remains stable with them. Some people have reported that their systems are not stable with these settings, so keep an eye on stability (stress test it) when using them.

Speedstep automatically lowers the multiplier from its max. (9x for the Q6600) to 6x when the machine is idle. The result is less power consumption and heat production. It goes back up to 9x when you start to get a CPU load. C1E has a similar function for voltage.

Why do you care about power savings? Increased power consumption translates into increased heat production. As well, power costs money. It’s true that energy savings will only matter when the machine is idle, but odds are your machine will spend most of its time at idle unless your run an app like fold@home or seti@home etc. Let’s assume for the sake of discussion that enabling these saves you 10 cents / day. A few pennies per day will add up over time. Using the dime-per-day as an example for a machine running every day is roughly a savings of $35 per year – not too shabby.

Tomshardware.com's power savings article reported a savings of 12 full watts by enabling speedstep on their test system.

Second thing you'll want to do is relax (lower) the timings on your memory. You can go back in and make them more aggressive once you find the right vcore for your overclock. You don't HAVE to change them now, but doing so do minimize the number of variables you’re dealing with on a first time overclock. In other words, if your machine isn't stable, you want to be sure it's due to the CPU settings, NOT the memory timings.



A good rule of thumb is to set the first four timings to 5-5-5-15 when you start. After you find your system is stable, lower them to 4-4-4-12 or whatever your memory I spec’ed out at and see if that’s stable. Don’t mess with the default values for the “sub timings” at this time. You can do that after you get a stable overclock.

Next find the section where you can control the nuts and bolts of your system. On my P5B-Del I had to switch the AI tuning to "manual" mode to see these options:



CPU Frequency - This is the FSB in MHz. Set it to whatever you’re planning to multiply by 9x (333 in my case).

DRAM Frequency - This the speed your RAM will run. I've found you get the best performance when running them in so-called "1:1" mode like I have shown. Remember the RAM is DDR2 so divide that 667 by 2 to get 333 or the ratio of the CPU-to-DRAM is 333:333 or 1:1.

PCI Express Frequency – Set this to 100 MHz. If you don’t I believe the PCIe bus speed will increase proportionally with your FSB which is something you DON’T want to do to your expensive video board.

PCI Clock Synchronization - Use 33.33 MHz here. Again, if you leave the setting on auto, the PCI clock will creep up proportionally with your FSB which can damage components such as SATA hard drives.

Spread Spectrum - disable.

Memory Voltage - Read the specs for your memory. My DIMMS can use up to 2.2v. You can damage your memory if you overvolt it.

CPU VCore – This is key!

In case you’re wondering what Intel recommends for your processor, find your chip on Intel's Processor Finder. The Q6600 is between 1.100V-1.372V

A good starting point is the upper end of that range. In my experience, a setting of “auto” ALWAYS over-estimates and thus over-volts. More on this later. For a Q6600, an initial setting of 1.37ish should be a good starting point. The end game here is to use a minimum vcore for a given FSB and multiplier you selected for your overclock. Finding the minimum vcore significantly lowered my cpu load and idle temps.

That said, many people also overvolt it (use values higher than Intel recommends) to achieve higher overclocks. Once you verify that you can run stable for several hours of stress testing (more on this later), you'll want to come back here and minimize this voltage until you become unstable again. Then simply add a little back. As you can see, my system running stable on 1.2625v.
The last four voltages are more for fine tuning once your system is running stable. Leave them on auto for now. On my system, I lowered my chipset temps by about 4 °C by lowering them to the values you see in the pic.

Okay, save your settings and hopefully your machine will complete the POST.



If it doesn’t, and assuming you set your voltages to Auto, some common reasons are:

• Memory voltage too low
• Memory timings too aggressive
• FSB too aggressive

If you complete the POST, and make it into windows without a blue screen or reboot that's a good sign. Now on to the testing.

Required Software

Here are few utilities you'll need to continue, all are freeware:

RMClock is what I like to measure the core temperatures of your chip. I know it gives accurate results w/ my hardware.
Speedfan is another app you can use to measure your temps. BEWARE that the core temps speedfan reports (as of version 4.32 anyway) are INCORRECT. They are off by 15 °C. You can use speedfan to get your NB (Northbirdge) chipset temp.
CPU-Z is a great app to display your current settings including vcore, FSB, multiplier, RAM settings, etc.
Orthos is the application you'll want to use to stress test your settings.

That's pretty much it. Do NOT trust the temperatures that your motherboard's free temp utility reads. At last "PC Probe 2" that comes with Asus boards really sucks because it's not measuring your core temps. They are what you really care about.

There are other temp monitoring programs and other stress testing programs too. These are what I recommend.... I'll only mention one other by name: TAT (thermal analysis tool). It's made by Intel and I don't care what anyone else out there thinks: it was NOT designed to read the coretemps of a C2D chip. It was written for Pentium M chips. Yes, it will display temps, and yes, sometimes they match up with the values RMClock displays, but I have found that TAT often reports temps higher than the real values. How do I know this? Read this thread and pay attention to uncleweb's instructions to use crystalcpuid to directly read your DTS (digital temperature sensor) and calculate your core temp yourself if you don't believe me.

Okay, now that you're in Windows, load up RMClock and have a look at your core temps when idle.



They should be well under 50 °C unless it's REALLY hot in your room, see the end of this document for more on how ambient temps affect your CPU load temps. There are a number of things you can do to bring down your idle and load temps. Again, see the end of this guide for some suggestions.

Let's stop here and figure out what the red-line for temps should be... in my mind you don’t want to exceed 65 °C for any sustained period of time. You can decide on your own if you disagree with me. Here is some information you can use to help:

Find your processor on Intel's Processor Finder and read the Thermal Specification. Quick links:

Q6600 (63 °C)
QX6700 (65 °C)
QX6800 (58 °C)

I may be misunderstanding it, but as I read it, this is the upper limit for the "case temp." No C2D or C2D quad processor actually has a sensor for "case temp" as defined by Intel. To measure this, you would need to place a sensor on the top of your IHS right in the center. C2D/quads have INTERNAL sensors, not external sensors. Some software and BIOS's can approximate this "case temp," but without a physical sensor there, you're just guessing. I freely admit that I have no idea what the temperature difference is between what the core temp and the case temp... some people think it's 15 °C which I do not agree with at all.

I think people are mistakenly confusing this with the difference between the constant Intel uses to calculate your core temp from the value the DTS (digital thermal sensor) is reporting. All C2D and C2D quad chips have a DTS inside the cores. For non-quad C2D chips, that constant is 85. So your Core Temp = 85 - DTS where DTS is the number the DTS is reporting. For a quad C2D chip, the constant is 100. So Core Temp = 100 - DTS. THIS DOESN'T MEAN THAT THE LIMIT FOR THE CHIP IS 100 °C!

I like to keep my core temps under 65 °C. I may be using a conservative number here, but I don't want to replace my chip anytime soon. If you don’t care about the longevity of your chip, you can likely use higher numbers. Some people think 70 °C is safe for example. I have read about people running their chips right up to the factory shutdown/auto throttle down temp of 85 °C. It’s your chip, do what you want.

Last edited by graysky : 06-09-2007 at 12:43 PM.
__________________
http://encoding.n3.net <-- for all your DVD/CD backup needs!
Reply%20With%20Quote Multi-Quote%20This%20Message Quick%20reply%20to%20this%20message
  #2  
Old 06-06-2007, 06:42 PM
graysky vbmenu_register("postmenu_1031148308", true); Limp Gawd, 3 Months
 
graysky%20is%20offline Report%20Post
What are the temps on my system for reference?


The temps in this table represent an average of data collected over approx. 1 h time period during the 2nd pass of a 2-pass x264 encode of a 720x480 DVD source using a high quality video profile. Data points were logged by Speedfan every 3-4 seconds over this time period. The average CPU usage was >99 % on all 4 cores throughout the experiments.

The term “Average Core Temp” refers to the speedfan core temp numbers (from the Intel Core sensor array) plus a 15 °C since version 4.32 of Speedfan incorrectly reports temps for quad core processors.

This was confirmed by an analysis of logs from both RMClock and Speedfan taken during a full load on all cores. EXACTLY the same time points (down to the same second) were averaged per core from each of the log files. The difference of these averages was found to be: 15.002, 15.069, 15.049, and 14.979 for each of the cores 0, 1, 2, and 3 respectively. In other words, Speedfan reported values that were on average 15 °C cooler than RMClock due to an error in the CPU detection of Speedfan. The temps reported in the graph are corrected and are the true internal core temps of the processor.

Another sidebar item: heat (power) increases with the square of voltage. It increases in a linear fashion with frequency. What does that mean? It means that as your FSB goes up, so does your heat, but as your vcore goes up, your heat goes up exponentially.

Here's some technical info from Intel you can read if you want. Read this document that helps explain it, see page 31:

Quote:
An increase in processor operating frequency not only increases system performance, but also increases the processor power dissipation. The relationship between frequency and power is generalized in the following equation: P = CV^2F (where P = power, C = capacitance, V = voltage, F = frequency). From this equation, it is evident that power increases linearly with frequency and with the square of voltage.
Same thing holds true for speed in a car: energy = 0.5mv^2 where m is mass and v is velocity. This is the basis of the old expression, "speed kills." You generate way more energy driving 75 MPH than you do driving 55 MPH since energy and velocity have an exponential relationship.

Anyway, load up CPU-Z to see what your vcore is at idle.



A setting of auto on mine gave a voltage of 1.325v. The screenshot above shows a vcore of 1.232v. This was taken after I modified my board which fixed the so-called vdroop which I’ll explain at the end of this guide. A suggested starting point is to add 0.03 to the number it’s displaying (1.355v in this case), and use that as your vcore in your BIOS. Reboot and set it manually now.

Now that you’re back in windows, you’ll notice that the vcore in CPU-Z is different from the value you selected in your BIOS. This is normal and true for all boards. You’ll also notice it drops again when your machine enters a load state: again, this is normal and as explained above, known as vdroop; some boards/chipsets do it worse than others.

Stress Testing

Now that you have CPU-Z and RMClock running, load up Orthos and run the Small FFTs - stress CPU test. Once it starts running, load up another instance of orthos and start it going on a Small FFTs test as well. Now bring up the task manager, go to the "processes" tab and right-click on one of the ORTHOS.exe and select CPU Affinity. You'll want to make one of the orthos loading on CPU0 and CPU1 and the other instance of ORTHOS.exe loading on CPU2 and CPU3: these are the 4 cores of your processor, and you'll want to spread the work between them.

Sometimes orthos crashes as a result of your setting the CPU affinity. Just kill it from the task manager, load a fresh one, and repeat. Now that both of the orthos are plugging away, your temps have probably gone up about 15-20 °C. This is normal and highly dependent on the room temp. Again, see the end of this document for more on this.

Monitor your temps as the orthos are running. If they exceed 70 °C, they are too hot in my opinion and I would recommend that you lower the overclock settings, or upgrade your cooling. Also remember that you can lower your vcore which will lower the temp at this point. The goal is to let othos run for at least an hour without giving an error or rebooting the machine. If your machine reboots or crashes, you likely need more vcore to support the overclock you’re running. You can either give it more vcore or lower the FSB numbers.

Here’s what an orthos error looks like:



Okay, so it ran for an hour without an error or crashing. Now go back to the BIOS and start to minimize your vcore for the CPU and stress testing for longer times. I think your goal should be 6+ hours of orthos. Other people will tell you to do it for 12 or more hours.

I think it’s easier to start with a lower vcore and work your way up. I started my testing @ 1.2875v and found that I got an orthos rounding error after just 3 minutes. I pumped it up to 1.3000v and got the same result. Further increasing it to 1.3125v gave an error after 26 minutes. Finally, 1.3250v ran stable for over 6 hours (I stopped it).

Once you get a stable overclock, you can try adding more aggressive memory timings back (like 4-4-4-12) and also try enabling those power savings options as well as lowing your other voltages. It’s best to do this one-at-a-time so you can understand the minimum for each one.

Well, you’ve seen the screenshots of my 9x333 settings, and all the power savings options are enabled for me and they work just fine with my system. That’s pretty much it.

The rest of the guide has bit more information about some of the topics I touched upon in the first part of the document; read on if you’re interested.

Temperature Management

An overclocked quad system is often limited by the amount of heat it’s producing, and the ability of the heat sink and fans to dissipate it. If you’re getting high temps, there are a number of things you can do to help. Most of them are hardware related:

• Minimize your vcore first (described in the guide)!
• Good contact between the CPU and Heat sink is a must. A major bang-for-the-buck modification in this regard is lapping the surfaces that transfer heat (the base of your heat sink and the top of your CPU). This involves gently moving the surface along wet/dry sand paper in increasing grits on a flat surface such as a piece of glass. I did both the base of my Ultra-120 Extreme and the IHS (Internal Heat Spreader) on my Q6600 and saw some pretty dramatic decreases in load temps.

It should be noted that lapping your HS and/or CPU will void the warranty. Comparing my stock HS/CPU to my lapped HS/CPU, on average lapping lowered the coolest core by 7 °C and the hottest core by 10 °C. To read more about lapping your heat sink and CPU see these two threads; I have results and pictures of the process:

Lapping Q6600 IHS
Lapping the Ultra-120 Extreme

• Consider an upgrade to a more efficient heat sink (like the few mentioned in the beginning of the guide). Remember that a quad core chip will produce about 2x the heat compared to a dual core chip. You really do need to consider using an extreme HS if you plan to overclock a quad.
• Consider an upgrade to the cooling fan on the heat sink to something that has more flow. Most of the larger HS’s will use a 120mm fan. Some have the option for two fans. I think the fastest 120mm fan you can use is around 1600 RPMs. If you have a slower one, you might consider upgrading.
• Reseat your heat sink and make sure you’re using a quality TIM (thermal interface material) such as AS5. Consider rotating the HS 90 degrees if it is designed to do so. I seem to get better contact with my Ultra-120 Extreme when it’s orientated “North/South” than when it’s orientated “East/West.”
• Re-evaluate the way you’re applying the TIM/don’t use too much or make sure you’re using enough. Thermal pastes aren’t all created equally. Some are reported to be better than others. I have always used Arctic Silver 5 on my CPUs (and AS3 and AS1 before that). You can find all sorts of posts out there showing one to be better than another. I’ll leave it up to you to pick one. Again, I like AS5. Here is a shot of my q6600 installed in the MB with AS5 right before I added the HS. It shows the right amount in my opinion given a lapped HS and CPU (which is a thicker line than I used before); the red triangle I drew shows where that tag is on the CPU, remember that on quad core chips, the dies are placed in a different located relative to a dual core, see the instructions on AS5's website for more on this.



• Use good cable management inside your case. Use twist ties or tie downs to bunch cables and keep them out of the way of airflow.
• Make sure you have adequate airflow inside the case and make sure you’re using a well ventilated case. People often overlook this, but it’s important. Not all cases are designed for good airflow. I have an Antec P182 which is a great design. Make sure you have several exhaust fans and at least one intake fan. 120mm fans move more air than smaller 80mm fans do and also run much more quietly.

You can see that my CPU load temps will increase/decrease as the ambient temperature fluctuates. Have a look at the following thread for details:

Effect of room temp on CPU load temps

Controlling vdroop

Remember the vdroop you saw earlier? If you have a P5B-Del, you can use a pencil to modify your board to minimize or fully remove this idle-to-load vdroop. Read the following thread if you want to do that:

Get more vcore under load: vdroop pencil mod (pics)

What is a better overclock?

Good question. I think that common thought is a higher bus rate and lower multiplier. Or is a low bus rate and higher multiplier better? For example, 9x333=3.0 GHz and 8x375=3.0 GHz.

I did a lot of testing on this one and concluded that there is no difference for real world applications. If you use a synthetic benchmark, like Sandra, you will see faster memory reads/writes, etc. with the higher FSB. This is great if all you do with your machine is run synthetic benchmarks. But the higher FSB comes at the cost of higher voltages for the board which equate to higher temps. Have a look at the following thread for more details:

Which is faster, 9x333 or 8x375 on a q6600? Results inside


Edited by skyR - 22 Oct 2007 at 7:02pm
Back to Top
Larry View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Email address used to purchase matched with forums account email.

Joined: 03 Aug 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 167
  Quote Larry Quote  Post ReplyReply bullet Posted: 05 Aug 2007 at 3:38pm
This kind of guide is good for those brave souls who want to overclock.  I, for one, rely on the experts to do any overclocking.  Thank you for taking the time to do something this in depth for the good of the community.
Back to Top
Kelly View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Digital Storm Customer Service


Joined: 13 May 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 791
  Quote Kelly Quote  Post ReplyReply bullet Posted: 05 Aug 2007 at 3:54pm
as most people should.  I mainly posted this so people can get a better understanding of what overclocking is and how it works.
Back to Top
xTgCxBUNKERKING View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 13 Oct 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 51
  Quote xTgCxBUNKERKING Quote  Post ReplyReply bullet Posted: 25 Oct 2007 at 7:02pm
the ram timings and what you need to set them at is where i get lost at...
Anything Worth Fighting For Is Worth Fighitng Dirty For
Back to Top
Digitalkryme View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 19 Jan 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 37
  Quote Digitalkryme Quote  Post ReplyReply bullet Posted: 19 Jan 2008 at 11:04am
Hey everyone, great guide, hopefully it will help me, i have a core 2 quad Q6600 (at stock atm) and my previous attempts at overclocking didn't work at all, i have a feeling it was low quality ram that was tripping me up, but hopefully it will work now with a little more patience.
 
My specs are
CPU:-                  Intel C2D Q6600
Mobo:-                Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3/S3
RAM:-                  4Gb Corsair 667mhz DDR2
Graphics:-           ATi X1950Pro 256mb PCIe (hate this card)
Sound:-              Creative Soundblaster X-Fi Platinum
Speakers:-          Logitech 5.1 X-530
Hard Drives:-      160gb WD, 160gb Samsung, 320gb WD (external)
Display:-             21" Sony Trinitron based Dell CRT Max res 1800 x 1440 @ refresh 120hz
Input:-                Logitech Cordless mouse and keyboard, Saitek X52
Cooling:-            1x 140mm Front mounted highspeed fan, 2x 120mm side fans, 1x 120mm rear fan
 
Its not quite a DigitalStorm system but it works fairly well :)
 
Before you mock someone, walk a mile in their shoes, then at least your a mile away and have their shoes as well :)
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 4.101563E-02 seconds.