FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Intel 9th generation owners, what are your plans f

Post Date: 2021-12-05

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Chopper View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 05 Dec 2021
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1
  Quote Chopper Quote  Post ReplyReply bullet Topic: Intel 9th generation owners, what are your plans f
    Posted: 05 Dec 2021 at 4:03am
Hey,

I personally got a i7 9700k, and seing the new RTX 3080/90 are beginning to be bottlenecked in some cases by current CPUs in lowers resolutions (1080p, 1440p) and high refresh rate gaming (144hz, 240hz), I’m thinking about how much I will wait before upgrading my CPU in the next years.

There are multiple choices, having current leaks : mobdro kodi

Q4 2020 : Ryzen 4xxx coming this end of year, probably promising ?

S1 2021 : Intel 11th generation (Comet Lake-S) with 14nm again but new architecture (+10% mono-core perf ?) and new PCIE-4

2022 : Intel 12th generation (Alder Lake) a big improvement with 7nm or 10nm processor, PCIE-5 and DDR5 RAM

What are your thoughts ?

Edited by Chopper - 06 Dec 2021 at 6:38am
Back to Top
Cretae View Drop Down
DS Veteran
DS Veteran

Email address used to purchase matched with forums account email.

Joined: 22 Mar 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7331
  Quote Cretae Quote  Post ReplyReply bullet Posted: 05 Dec 2021 at 7:40am
My first thought is this: this is why you should choose the right GPU for your workload. Not sure why it matters if a 3080 is bottlenecked at 1080p. Yeah, it says 2.82% on your proc, but that's what, 7 fps at 240? Doesn't it still get dozens of FPS more than a lesser card? The 3070 doesn't bottle neck at that res.

My second thought is the bottlenecks I've checked are negligible: .38% at 1440p and .26% at 4K from the 3080 on your proc.

If this is about competitive gaming, you get what you have to have, I guess. There may be a slight edge to a pro, but the vast majority of us can hardly see a difference between, say, 120 and 150 fps, let alone 230 and 240.

The Intel gen 11s were a bust.

The Alder Lakes are out now, and there are specs and benchmarks available.

Time will tell about Zen 4, but I expect another leap ahead of Intel to compete with Raptor Lake, blowing by Alder Lake.

If you have a legit reason to obsess over bottlenecking, be my guest. For the vast majority of us it should not be an issue. If you upgrade to a new GPU that gets an average of 30fps more than the old one, who cares if an older proc reduces that by 5? It's still a heck of an upgrade.   
Back to Top
MrCheetah View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 09 Mar 2021
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 392
  Quote MrCheetah Quote  Post ReplyReply bullet Posted: 05 Dec 2021 at 8:02am
I think, you'll be fine:

CS:GO - RTX 3080 Ti i9 10900K 5.2GHz - 1080p 1440p 4K - Low & Max Settings | Jansn Benchmarks (YouTube)
(300 to 600 FPS)

CSGO - i5 11400F + RTX 3080 Ti - 1440p Max Settings - FPS Benchmark Test | QualityBenchmarks (YouTube)

CSGO - i5 11400F + RTX 3080 Ti - 1080p Max Settings - FPS Benchmark Test | QualityBenchmarks (YouTube)

The i5 results are a little strange, neither GPU nor CPU are hitting 100%. The GPU ~50% and CPU ~28%. Even so, the FPS is 120+.

Originally posted by Cretae

you should choose the right GPU for your workload

Agreed.

P.S. Holding my tongue about the FPS chase.

Edited by MrCheetah - 05 Dec 2021 at 8:15am
• Ryzen 5600X, ROG Strix B550-I, RX 6900 XT, 32GB Vengeance, 960GB MP510
• be quiet 500DX, i7 11700K, ROG Strix Z590-E, RTX 4080 ProArt + RTX 4070 Ti ProArt, 64GB HyperX Fury, 2TB SN850
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 2.734375E-02 seconds.