intel burn test resultsPost Date: 2008-11-08 |
Post Reply
|
| Author | ||
jtspectra2
Senior Member
Joined: 07 Oct 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 840 |
Quote Reply
Topic: intel burn test resultsPosted: 08 Nov 2008 at 10:42pm |
|
![]() Are These Temps Good For Running An Intel Burn At Max Stress 5 times ?? |
||
|
Q9650 @ 4.2Ghz( Liquid Cooled), 4GB 1600Mhz DDR3, GTX280 SLI, VRaptor,HAF 932
|
||
![]() |
||
DST4ME
DS ELITE
Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 Nov 2008 at 10:51pm |
|
|
yes they are
|
||
![]() |
||
RiceEatin2000GT
DS Veteran
Joined: 02 Oct 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1699 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 Nov 2008 at 11:47pm |
|
|
doesn't that seem a bit high for liquid cooling???
|
||
|
||
![]() |
||
DST4ME
DS ELITE
Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 Nov 2008 at 11:49pm |
|
|
well that all depends on his room, location of the PC, etc.
his highest core hit 73 under tremendous stress, I say that is good. Intelburn is not like the other tests, it stresses the heck of the chip Edited by DST4ME - 08 Nov 2008 at 11:50pm |
||
![]() |
||
XpubuX
Senior Member
Joined: 16 Oct 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 726 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Nov 2008 at 12:25am |
|
|
How come not all cpuidhm show systin temps? different versions maybe.
Edited by XpubuX - 09 Nov 2008 at 12:26am |
||
![]() |
||
jtspectra2
Senior Member
Joined: 07 Oct 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 840 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Nov 2008 at 12:33am |
|
i said the same thing man. it does seem a little bit high for me having LC. although , my resovior is right next to my GPUs, and i have a battery backup almost right next to my side fan next to my tower, im not sure how much that makes a difference. also my room is pretty cool like around 65 70 degrees. |
||
|
Q9650 @ 4.2Ghz( Liquid Cooled), 4GB 1600Mhz DDR3, GTX280 SLI, VRaptor,HAF 932
|
||
![]() |
||
RiceEatin2000GT
DS Veteran
Joined: 02 Oct 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1699 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Nov 2008 at 1:50am |
|
at 65-70 F in my room with realtemp running i was showing 68C at full load with a q9550 at 3.56. Air cooled system. Although when i went into my bios and looked at my ambient temps at idle they were about 6 C higher in there so add 6 and i was at roughly 74C after 6 passes of that burn in test. |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
jtspectra2
Senior Member
Joined: 07 Oct 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 840 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Nov 2008 at 2:36am |
|
|
either way that was at max load , and im not to worried about it considering the only time that will happen is if i run that test. while playing games like FSX which is very CPU demanding, or even running Vantage, my temps stay below 70 . so the LC works just fine, and i still have room for a little more OC , even though my temps got so high with Intel Burn. its all good.
|
||
|
Q9650 @ 4.2Ghz( Liquid Cooled), 4GB 1600Mhz DDR3, GTX280 SLI, VRaptor,HAF 932
|
||
![]() |
||
DST4ME
DS ELITE
Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Nov 2008 at 2:40pm |
|
|
Like I said before, the only thing that matter is what are your temps during your usage
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |