Intel SSD 320 versus 510Post Date: 2011-08-10 |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
desoto
Newbie
Joined: 22 May 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 74 |
Quote Reply
Topic: Intel SSD 320 versus 510Posted: 10 Aug 2011 at 6:35pm |
|
120 gb 320 series or 510 series. The 510 is $50. more on newegg and I am willing to pay it but don't have the experience to know the difference. Plan to install on ODE 1. Can you guide me?
|
|
![]() |
|
mikec
Groupie
Joined: 04 Jun 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 111 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 Aug 2011 at 11:55pm |
|
Both are quick, but I believe the 320 is still recommended here.
If I'm not mistaken: * 320 controller has a longer history of reliability (Intel controller that's been used for a while, vs Marvel in the 510) * 320 has better warranty (5 year vs 3 year) * 320 has better small file read speed * 510 has better sequential reads for large files (if on SATA3) |
|
![]() |
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE
Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Aug 2011 at 1:53am |
|
Most of your use is gonna be in 4k file sizes, the 320 is faster there.
We like/recommend the 320 here. |
|
![]() |
|
desoto
Newbie
Joined: 22 May 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 74 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Aug 2011 at 7:34am |
|
Good points about file sizes and warranty. For my use, 320 is better and $50. less.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum |