Low overclockPost Date: 2007-09-26 |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
pinebot
Newbie
Joined: 10 Sep 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 11 |
Quote Reply
Topic: Low overclockPosted: 26 Sep 2007 at 6:04pm |
|
Hi Guys,
I got a quad 6600 with stage 3 cooling (extreme case). Before I ordered customer service said I'd get around a 3.0 Ghz OC out of that, but it looks like mine only came in at 2.8, which must be way at the low end. My question is if you got a unit that was unstable at 3 Ghz, why not use that in a non-OC system and give the people that pay for the OC the chips that you can wring the higher OC from? |
|
![]() |
|
4261
Newbie
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 99 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 Sep 2007 at 6:12pm |
|
I don't think DSO goes for mamimum OC meaning that your chip is not necessarilly unstable at 3.0. Going over 2.8 is up to the owner.
I am sure someone will correct me if I am wrong.
|
|
![]() |
|
Jingping
Groupie
Joined: 11 Sep 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 193 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 Sep 2007 at 7:29pm |
Ditto here. I spoke to Alex about it, and he said it was essentially a motherboard issue; that the 680i LT wasn't able to overclock as high as the 680i (one of the reasons that the LT version is 90 bucks cheaper, I guess). You're lucky; mine was OC'd to 2.7.
Just another misunderstanding, albeit one that might've been nice to have cleared up beforehand...
On the other hand, I -am- enjoying my computer :)
|
|
![]() |
|
Kelly
Senior Member
Digital Storm Customer Service
Joined: 13 May 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 791 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 Sep 2007 at 7:54pm |
|
You have to understand that we do not guarantee overclocks. Overclocking a chip is not exact as there are no 2 chips that overclock the exact same. Add that with the current hardware configuration, you will find that a ball park average for the q6600 with the best hardware is around 2.7-3.1.
Core2Duo chips oc a lot higher and better due to the fact they have less overhead. My e6600 processor is running at 3.6 atm and I have gotten it to 4.0 with air cooling. Now, my qx6800 processor is lucky to oc from 2.9 to 3.3 and stay stable.
So that being said... taking a 2.4 chip and pushing it to the max is up to the owner. Pushing a 2.4 chip to the highest stable configuration is all we want to do. I am sorry if some chips clock better than yours and if yours oc better than someone elses... we can't do anything about that. we do the best we can with the configurations you all give us.
|
|
![]() |
|
pinebot
Newbie
Joined: 10 Sep 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 11 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 Sep 2007 at 8:12pm |
|
I guess, like the delivery delays, this is another case of over-promising and under delivering. The point isn't what is "guaranteed", it's that someone represented to me pre-purchase that they can get 3.0 out of it. If, instead, at that time I was told what you just wrote, my expectations would have been met and I would have been happy. I guess my point is be careful what you tell customers because they will expect you to deliver on it. If the policy is stated clearly upfront I think no one would have a problem with it.
|
|
![]() |
|
Alex
Admin Group
Digital Storm Supervisor
Joined: 04 Jun 2012 Online Status: Offline Posts: 16314 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 Sep 2007 at 12:13am |
|
I totally understand what you mean about the overclocking, but, please understand that overclocking itself is an Art. Various issues such as heat, motherboard selection, and even the CPU batch can vary an overclock. We can push your system to hit 3.0GHz+, but, we felt that we preferred your system to not run as hot and be more reliable. It's not us under delivering, its more of us making sure you receive a high-quality product.
We have made Q6600's hit 3.0GHz+, but, I strongly don't believe anyone said, yes we will hit 3.0GHz+ with no problem on your machine and promised it. Give us a call, we can tell you which settings to set in the BIOS to hit that mark.
We want you to be happy as a customer, if 3.0GHz+ will, call us, we will make it happen.
About the delays, we never promise a delivery time-frame, but provide an estimation, we do our best to get systems out sooner. All of our update emails state that it's only an estimation and your system could be held back for various reasons. But, that's a different story, the back to school season had us backed up. We been working long and extra hard (weekends/overtime) to catch up and will never sacrifice quality of speed. As we are always striving to improve our customer service on a day-to-day basis, we are actually implanting a system to automatically notify customers of delays.
---
Please feel free to get a hold of me so we can come to an agreement to make you happy. As a side note, you won't even notice the performance difference between your quad-core running at 2.8GHz or 3.0Ghz.
Edited by Alex - 27 Sep 2007 at 12:14am |
|
![]() |
|
Kenny
Newbie
Digital Storm Engineering
Joined: 24 Aug 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 509 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 Sep 2007 at 3:55am |
|
Yeah, Alex is right, there is no any difference between your quad-core running at 2.8GHz and 3.0Ghz. The difference is 0.4GHz+ from your original CPU speed(2.4GHz).
|
|
|
We're here with you ! &(*_~)&
|
|
![]() |
|
sundowner
Senior Member
Joined: 11 Sep 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 501 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 Sep 2007 at 5:22am |
|
So If I purchased a new heatsink I could push the 2.4 to 2.8 easily then?
|
|
|
Pro case with extra fan
Quad Q6600 2.4 OC'd 3.1! Nvidia 8800GT Asus Maximus Formula Mobo 2xgb 800mhz corsair xfire - xuntiltheendx |
|
![]() |
|
Kenny
Newbie
Digital Storm Engineering
Joined: 24 Aug 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 509 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 Sep 2007 at 11:45am |
|
Yeah, you should have a good air cooling heatsink for your CPU before you're going to overclock it, because it will be hot after you overclocked.
|
|
|
We're here with you ! &(*_~)&
|
|
![]() |
|
Bill the Cat
DS Veteran
Forum Bitch!
Joined: 27 Aug 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1150 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 Sep 2007 at 12:01pm |
|
The difference between 2.8 MHz and 3.0 MHz is only 7%! I can't believe the difference is humanly perceptible. Is it?
|
|
![]() |
|
commast
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 Sep 2007 at 1:17pm |
The stage 2 fan/heatsink combo can OC your system to 2.8 easily. I was looking at your config in your sig and see that you choose the 680i LT motherboard instead of the A1. With the LT motherboards don't expect too much since it can't be OC as high as the A1 revision motherboard. |
|
![]() |
|
sundowner
Senior Member
Joined: 11 Sep 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 501 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 Sep 2007 at 8:15pm |
|
i got stage 1 with a pro case, so i'll have to get a new one later.
|
|
|
Pro case with extra fan
Quad Q6600 2.4 OC'd 3.1! Nvidia 8800GT Asus Maximus Formula Mobo 2xgb 800mhz corsair xfire - xuntiltheendx |
|
![]() |
|
Alex
Admin Group
Digital Storm Supervisor
Joined: 04 Jun 2012 Online Status: Offline Posts: 16314 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 Sep 2007 at 10:27pm |
|
A 7% difference is not noticeable at all.
|
|
![]() |
|
Brandon
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 Sep 2007 at 3:52am |
|
Im glad you guys dont sacrifice quality just to get PC's out tha door. Heck Id rather you guys take your time and send a perfect machine out. Im getting the quadcore w/twisterboost also and I trust DS's judgment that they get the max out of it 2.7-3.0 whatever. And I thought I was a perfectionist...........
|
|
![]() |
|
thecomplex
Senior Member
Joined: 18 Sep 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 230 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 Sep 2007 at 8:34am |
|
Just as a sidenote (because I've been very impressed with the service DS aims to provide even though I don't have my system yet) - this seems to be less about the noticeable difference between 2.8 and 3.0 GHz and more about managing customer expectations.. everything from shipping times and assembly delays to overclocks.
Among other things, I oversee customer service functions for a large-scale e-commerce business and I know it's very hard to do. Nonetheless, it seems a lot of forum topics point in this direction, so an effort to address it (either with stronger verbiage about how ship times are only an estimate, or an explanation of "the art of overclocking") might be really helpful to you in terms of ultimately satisfying people to a greater degree. Hopefully my comments don't come across as anything other than an observation ![]() Having said that, I can't wait to get my rig! Chris Edited by thecomplex - 28 Sep 2007 at 8:35am |
|
|
Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 @ 3.52GHz
4GB DDR2 Corsair 1066MHz Dominator (2) 150GB WD Raptor (10K RPM) (1) 120GB Maxtor (7200RPM) nVidia GeForce 8800GTX 768MB Vista Home Premium 64 |
|
![]() |
|
67alecto
Groupie
Joined: 02 Sep 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 288 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 Sep 2007 at 10:31am |
|
I'm not at all interested in overclocking, but I admit that if I was told I'd be at 3.0, and I was at 2.8, I'd probably have concerns as well.
For people who are into overclocking, that extra .2 is bragging rights. It's like saying 100 FPS is too low because you've seen another machine hit 120. For many people, the benchmarks are a status symbol and they are willing to pay for it.
I think a good solution would be, in addition to a decent explanation of the challenges of overclocking when it is selected in the build options, would be a pledge by DS to be within a certain range of the goal.
Maybe it will end up higher, maybe it will be lower - stability being the key - but it will fall within the acceptable range or it won't go out the door.
thecomplex hit it on the head - it's about managing expectations.
|
|
|
Twister Pro
750W PS/Q6600 2.4GHz/680i LT/2GB Corsair 800/9800GTX/X-Fi XtremeGamer/Stage 2 Cooling Vanquish II 430W Corsair/i3 3.3 GHz/Asus H61M/8Gb DDR3 Corsair Vengeance/650Ti Boost 2Gb |
|
![]() |
|
EdH63
DS Veteran
Joined: 01 Sep 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1826 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 Sep 2007 at 10:52am |
|
I think everyone needs to try and understand what they're buying and the potential of their hardware. I do agree it is important that DS defines certain parameters when talking to people about their configuration, however, it is equally important that the consumer research and understand along with DS' consultation the capabilities of that configuration.
It's been talked about many times in these forums that the A-1 revision can achieve 3.0 and beyond easier. I think that we all can get overly excited about all of this and forget to ask the questions according to our personal specs. This is why if you have any questions you PM Alex, Kelly or any of the managers about your specific concerns. Reading everything on these forums and making a decision from this info is not the best way to assure your personal satisfaction. Your happiness needs to be based on your purchase, not someone that's got a similar build. It could be that subtle difference in the build that keeps you from hitting the expectation. ASK... ASK... ASK! |
|
![]() |
|
pinebot
Newbie
Joined: 10 Sep 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 11 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 Sep 2007 at 12:22pm |
|
I have had my rig for a few days now and it is great and DS did a fantastic job. It's quiet as a mouse compared to my old Dell XPS gen 2 and it's lightening fast. All other elements of my buying experience have been wonderful. I also think that the fact that DS allows this exchange of ideas and public critiquing speaks volumes about the high quality nature of the team. So this is not a complaint, it is feedback!
That being said, thecomplex has hit the nail on the head precisely. The reason I posted was not because I really care about 3.0 vs. 2.8 (and I do have the A1 revision by the way), but because of the way expectations were managed. I am not even suggesting DS should promise *anything*, just be clear about what will be delivered. The direct quote from sales, pre-purchase, was: "I took a look at your configuration and with that processor and the cooling you should be fine for roughly 3ghz. The most we got out of one of these cpu's with the cooling you selected is 3.2ghz." My observation was that the 2.8 that I got was probably on the low end of that (after all it's a boost of 0.4 Ghz above the 2.4 baseline, which is only 66% of the way to 3.0). If DS tacked on to that original response something like: "but we make no guarantees and they've been as low as 2.7, we can't really control it", then my expectations would have been perfectly aligned with what was delivered. So why set expectations higher that you can consistently deliver? it's unnecessary. Just provide the appropriate caveats up front. it's simple. |
|
![]() |
|
Tyler Lowe
Newbie
Joined: 14 May 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 0 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 Sep 2007 at 12:59pm |
|
It's always a good idea to ask, ask, ask. It's an even better idea to research, research, research... before asking. But I think the criticism is pretty constructive. Showing a better explanation in the information tab for cooling options on why every chip is different, and how MoBo choices can impact a final OC result, would help people to come from a more informed position so they feel comfortable asking questions. Seperating the cooling options from the overclock option would be another fine step towards making the selection process more computer novice friendly. By doing this, the information tabs could be better tailored to delivering information on these choices in a more easy to digest format. Even a simple "(supports Twisterboost)" or "(recomended for Twisterboost)" tacked on to the motherboard item field would make things more clear.
Provided someone understands that the realworld difference between 2.8Ghz and 3.0 Ghz, while running applications is minimal to non existant before they place their order, I would think the concern level would be also minimal to non existant.
No one likes to feel dumb when discussing a purchase, so any small measure that can help make someone more informed will also lead to better dialogue at the time an order is placed IMO. Given the responses I have seen by DS to constructive criticism/advice in the past, they are probably already looking at ways to be more proactive in ensuring the customer *never* feels like the system they ordered has underdelivered.
|
|
![]() |
|
donkeypunch
Senior Member
Joined: 21 Sep 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 188 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Oct 2007 at 12:55am |
|
I couldn't agree more Tyler. As a matter of fact, i didn't even notice the "TwisterBoost" option when I placed my order. I saw that was the only difference between stage 2 and 3. It was after I ordered that I finally noticed the little "?" and found out TwisterBoost is OC'ing. Definitely recommend separating that.
I was also told 3 ghz is doable(which it certainly is) but when I called today to request the TwisterBoost I was told I can expect 2.6-2.8, MAYBE 2.9 but not to get my hopes up. I don't understand why 333x9 to give 3ghz cant be achieved fairly easily, even if the voltage had to be bumped a tiny bit. Heres a very good article about OC'ing the Q6600 on the 680i boards, and how 3.2-3.3 is attainable easily on air. No reason 3ghz cant run stable on the specs i've chosen, at least none I can see. I actually thought that was well below anything that would push it as thats the last thing I want. But from almost everything i've read and heard lead me to believe running the Q6600 on a 680i at 3ghz with an adequate cpu cooler was well within its limit. And i completely agree the hardware chosen plays a huge role-but seems like the OC'ing is done much more on the lower end of the spectrum. Heres a link that has some great info and benchmarks comparing stock Q6600's to overclocked ones on a 680i board and P35. The benchmarks included games and some common programs. Games weren't improved much-but graphic editing, photshop, etc showed a good deal of improvement. Here ya go! http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2007/07/25/overclocking_intel_core_2_quad_q6600/1 Im on my 8th business day now, and was called today to let me know the red round cables are not in stock so I had to go with black. No big deal, but this means its still in the process of being put together, and I imagine it still has to go through the 72 hour burn in. Not complaining at all-was just hoping it would be shippable this week. No big deal. And as for the OC'ing, I was actually going to put it to 3ghz myself but didnt want to mess with any warranty issues. I guess I was just surprised to hear that 2.9Ghz was the absolute cap. Ah well, whaddya gonna do right? ![]() And comparing real world difference is kind of irrelavant no? I mean why does Intel bother selling both Q6600 and Q6700's then if the difference is so minimal? Benchmarking is all about numbers, at least when going to extremes anyway. After a certain frame rate in games you cant really tell. And whats a few seconds less when compressing a file, or converting file types? In any case, don't take this the wrong way, if the techs don't feel comfortable with clocking the Q6600 at 3ghz thats fine. They're the techs and i'll go with whatever they feel comfortable with. Edited by donkeypunch - 03 Oct 2007 at 1:04am |
|
![]() |
|
Bill the Cat
DS Veteran
Forum Bitch!
Joined: 27 Aug 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1150 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Oct 2007 at 9:11am |
Your conclusion is not necessarily true. I was told my color choice was not available on the day the system shipped! Apparently (it's even logical) the fancy cables and cable dressing are the last thing to get done. You don't want to go to all that trouble only to discover after testing that you have to rip the box apart again. So, I don't think you can read anything into this one way or the other.... Edited by Bill the Cat - 03 Oct 2007 at 9:13am |
|
![]() |
|
Bill the Cat
DS Veteran
Forum Bitch!
Joined: 27 Aug 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1150 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Oct 2007 at 9:40am |
Where to begin? Excuse me if this is "old news", but you do realize that Q6600s, Q6700's and all the other Quads are made in the same waffer fab and may have even come from the same waffer? Testing after they're made determines what model processor each die gets turned into. This is called "binning". For what ever Voodoo related reasons, some dies just work better than others. Chips that aren't fast enough to be Q6700s, for what ever reason, may meet the specs for a Q6600....
Why does Intel sell Q6600s and Q6700s? $$$$$. Some people are willing to pay for the preceived difference; real or not. Of course, there are rare applications where the tiny performance edge makes a real difference.
Where it gets interesting is if Intel doesn't set it's prices just right, they wind up with more Q6700 quality dies than they can sell. Those dies get thrown in the Q6600 bin. Those are the parts overclockers hope they get. This is also why slower parts, like the E6550 can usually be overclocked more than faster parts like the E6850.
|
|
![]() |
|
Jingping
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Oct 2007 at 12:05pm |
|
Remember, buddy, there's overclocking, then there's overclocking backed by a three year warranty. That last part is critical. With a built in long warranty like that, stability has to be of utmost concern to them, so they have to leave considerable margins of safety in. Just good business sense. And it's probably better for the computer as well; you can always OC it some more yourself if you REALLY need the extra points later.
|
|
![]() |
|
Bill the Cat
DS Veteran
Forum Bitch!
Joined: 27 Aug 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1150 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Oct 2007 at 1:38pm |
|
Here's something else to think about. In a series of articles about overclocking on Tom's Hardware, Dr. Thomas Pabst, namesake of the website said,
He was referring to "Electromigration"; a process that gradually kills all semiconductor components and kills them much faster when they are run too hot. The article doesn't come right out and say so, but it suggests that most, or at least many, semi-extreme overclockers find a one or two year CPU life span acceptable.
|
|
![]() |
|
donkeypunch
Senior Member
Joined: 21 Sep 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 188 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Oct 2007 at 3:11pm |
|
I completely agree with everything you guys are saying. Believe me, I don't want a system that isn't stable. I would much prefer a slower system thats rock solid over a blazing processor that croaks every other reboot! I just thought pushing a Q6600 to 3Ghz wasn't even nearing the outer limits of its capability. Again, hardware, case design, cooling, etc all play a huge part in that, but attaining 3Ghz on air didn't seem too drastic.
I could certainly understand DS scoffing at a 3.4Ghz request as this is getting quite high. Although I've seen plenty of Q6600's pushed that high on air, I myself wouldn't want it. Even if it were stable I wouldn't want to have to invest in fan controllers, more dedicated fans/heatsinks, having to constantly monitor temps, etc. I'm looking for the set it and forget it method which is why i elected to have DS OC for me. Whatever they decide to clock the processor at is where im going to keep it as I just dont want to chance having any warranty issues. Concerning the performance increases, I agree the performance gain is quite minimal. My point was minimul gains are still noteworthy. For instance, whats the average increase in a DS TwisterBoost Overclock? If its getting a Q6600 to 2.6 your talking a 200mhz increase-a $25 premium. If it just wasn't worth it then why offer it at all? Same as the debate between the G0 and B3 steppings. The performance difference is minimal-but a performance boost nonetheless. As for the cables, it truly didnt bother me. I mean of course my first choice was red but having black is no big deal. And to be honest, I'm very happy they at least called to let me know. Even though it was a minor issue its still nice to get an update-which many companies wont bother to do. My concern was I thought they just started building it now! Then that would be quite awhile before it begins the 72 hour burn in. And even that is fine. By no means am I trying to rush things, just anxious is all. ![]() I think what makes it worse for me is my original Dell blew up on Aug 30 so I've been stuck using a laptop or my very old spare Dell for over a month and I'm anxious to get a newer rig to get back to gaming/movie watching/downloading gigs of %100 pure unfiltered adult entertainment bliss, etc. I didn't mean for the post to come off as knocking DS-I'm very happy with everything and trust their judgment. I was just surprised that hitting 2.9Ghz was considered the very limit and pushing the envelope. Oh, and I'm all for the 2-3 year shelf life for my computers. Thats actually about the longest i'll wait on upgrading a whole new system is 3 years-depending on what new comes out. The staggering pace at which technology advances almost calls for this anyway-especially for gaming. ![]() Edited by donkeypunch - 03 Oct 2007 at 3:17pm |
|
![]() |
|
thecomplex
Senior Member
Joined: 18 Sep 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 230 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Oct 2007 at 3:15pm |
I share your pain. Check out my thread about the recent of my poor computer:http://www.digitalstormonline.com/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=509 Chris Edited by thecomplex - 03 Oct 2007 at 3:16pm |
|
|
Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 @ 3.52GHz
4GB DDR2 Corsair 1066MHz Dominator (2) 150GB WD Raptor (10K RPM) (1) 120GB Maxtor (7200RPM) nVidia GeForce 8800GTX 768MB Vista Home Premium 64 |
|
![]() |
|
donkeypunch
Senior Member
Joined: 21 Sep 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 188 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Oct 2007 at 3:38pm |
|
LOL, that was a great thread Chris. Gave me a good chuckle! And that is some wiring job, holy cow!
Those are some nice specs in your soon to be had Digital Storm rig. I would think either/both the ram and motherboard would have to be replaced. Always stinks seeing a part go up in smoke. ![]() I went out and bought a new 24" monitor, surround sound speakers, cordless mouse/keyboard, all ready to be hooked up, so that makes the wait feel that much longer as well. Ugggg- the suspense! I also bought Bioshock and Neverwinter Nights to have something to throw in the new computer. I dont want to throw my old Dell away as im going to use it as a media server of sorts. It still runs good but had to replace the ATI 9800 Pro with a 9600 Pro. The dinky fan died on the 9800, and since I needed it back up and running asap I didnt want to chance buying an aftermarket Zalman fan only to find out the GPU was crispy fried, so I opted to downgrade instead of getting a VGA cooler. Does Ibuypower have a 3 year warranty? Even if it does your probably like 3 hours past the deadline-always works like that with me lol. In any case, I hope you get some answers and get your computer back up and running.! ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum |