Need help with hard drive configPost Date: 2013-08-19 |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
eastpoint
Newbie
Joined: 14 Aug 2013 Online Status: Offline Posts: 10 |
Quote Reply
Topic: Need help with hard drive configPosted: 19 Aug 2013 at 9:35am |
|
Config # 861115 - I though I was already to order a computer and now I am wondering if this is the best configuration. Planned to go with 512 GB Samsung Pro
because I only need 500 GB total storage (still have 290 GB free space on my 5 year old 500 GB drive) and I wanted to avoid multiple drives so I don't need to deal with multiple directories. To say the least I am no computer wiz. Would it be a better idea going with a 256 GB Samsung and a 1 TB WD mechanical drive just for whatever reason?? I don't care all that much about the $170. difference. Just trying to get the configuration right the 1st time. Computer is used for business/home office. No CAD, video games. Thanks!!
|
|
![]() |
|
bprat22
DS ELITE
DigitalStorm East -- (Unofficially!)
Joined: 08 Jun 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 20391 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Aug 2013 at 11:14am |
|
The main reason for the HDD is lots of much cheaper storage. If you don't have much and don't mind more $$ per GB then just go with the SSD.
Good luck.
|
|
![]() |
|
eastpoint
Newbie
Joined: 14 Aug 2013 Online Status: Offline Posts: 10 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Aug 2013 at 11:30am |
|
Thank You Thats what I really wanted to hear. Just a little unnerved about some of the reliability issues(Max read/write cycles and a few others) that I am hearing about SSD's
|
|
![]() |
|
bprat22
DS ELITE
DigitalStorm East -- (Unofficially!)
Joined: 08 Jun 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 20391 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Aug 2013 at 11:36am |
|
I trust HDD more than a SSD but they can both fail. Kind of a crap-shoot I guess.
|
|
![]() |
|
danjw1
Senior Member
Joined: 07 Jul 2013 Online Status: Offline Posts: 667 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Aug 2013 at 2:51pm |
Samsung does good reliability testing, so I don't think it is that much of a crap shoot. But, as always, backup the data you can't afford to lose. |
|
![]() |
|
fstcvc
DS Veteran
Joined: 06 Jul 2013 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2551 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Aug 2013 at 9:16pm |
|
Data can be lost with either method... As danjw1 said, backup anything you have that's important (in multiple places if it's super important - like an online backup or cloud service).
I think that SSD's are more reliable as they are basically RAM with a more permanent on/off switch (data is held without power). And I've had way more HDD's fail than RAM...
|
|
|
HailStorm II
i7 4770K @ 4.5GHz Asus Maximus VI Extreme 16GB Corsair Dominator Platinum 3xSLI EVGA SuperClocked GTX TITAN Samsung 840Pro SSD 256GB+512GB HydroLux+XSPC CPU/MoBo/GPU Liquid Cooling |
|
![]() |
|
danjw1
Senior Member
Joined: 07 Jul 2013 Online Status: Offline Posts: 667 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Aug 2013 at 12:13am |
I do not believe that is actually true. RAM uses an entirely different technology since it isn't expected to persist without power. Flash memory does have a limited read/write life. But, from what I have read in desktop usage, it should have life that is roughly comparable with a hard drive. Also, the SSDs controller and bios are designed to minimize ware. That said, die shrinks lead to less life, with current technologies. Update: I just ran across this article: http://www.anandtech.com/show/7237/samsungs-vnand-hitting-the-reset-button-on-nand-scaling To summarize it, Samsung's newest fab technology for flash memory is has flattened the curve on flash memory life. Edited by danjw1 - 21 Aug 2013 at 12:41am |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum |