Quad 295 or Tri 285Post Date: 2009-06-13 |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
SuperSoldier1
Newbie
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 57 |
Quote Reply
Topic: Quad 295 or Tri 285Posted: 13 Jun 2009 at 6:02pm |
|
I have been looking for a definitive answer but have not been able to find one. I am aware both are amazing options, but what is the best? I want to play Crysis on Ultra high at 1920 x 1080 or something very close. I know at those settings every FPS counts, which will serve me the best in games?
|
|
![]() |
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE
Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jun 2009 at 6:05pm |
|
3 x 275 is what you want, they will give you over 60 fps which is what you want
|
|
![]() |
|
SuperSoldier1
Newbie
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 57 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jun 2009 at 6:09pm |
|
They will give me over 60 FPS in Crysis on Ultra High?
![]() This shows me that this is getting about 56 FPS on High, I am going for Ultra High.... Edited by SuperSoldier1 - 13 Jun 2009 at 6:17pm |
|
![]() |
|
SuperSoldier1
Newbie
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 57 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jun 2009 at 6:12pm |
|
Tell me if you cant see the picture, I will see if I can figure out why I cant see it... |
|
![]() |
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE
Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jun 2009 at 6:21pm |
|
crysis is more cpu bound, I see tri sli doing 74 fps, you can't get any better then that, but not at ultra high, at ultra high you won't get 60 fps no matter what you use.
at 2x MSAA with quad sli you will get around 55-60 fps, tri sli 275 around 60-65 fps and tri sli 285 around 65-70 fps at best. the image does not state what cpu, what cpu speed, what drivers, or what setting |
|
![]() |
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE
Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jun 2009 at 6:23pm |
|
ok I see you edited and posted the link so we got a 920 at 3.8 which is great but the drivers are old.
new drivers will give better performance, but with crysis you can get only so many fps. |
|
![]() |
|
SuperSoldier1
Newbie
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 57 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jun 2009 at 6:23pm |
|
Here is the specs of this benchmark:
Edited by SuperSoldier1 - 13 Jun 2009 at 6:25pm |
|
![]() |
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE
Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jun 2009 at 6:25pm |
|
what is their defenition of high? what is aa for example?
at what level are they getting those fps? as you know some levels are good and some level fps drops Edited by DST4ME - 13 Jun 2009 at 6:26pm |
|
![]() |
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE
Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jun 2009 at 6:30pm |
|
30 FPS and under: very limited gameplay
30-40 FPS: average yet very playable 40-60 FPS: good gameplay 60 FPS and higher: best possible gameplay Edited by DST4ME - 13 Jun 2009 at 6:31pm |
|
![]() |
|
SuperSoldier1
Newbie
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 57 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jun 2009 at 6:36pm |
|
I am pretty sure their definiton of High is the game's preset called "High" and I am unfamiliar what AA is on that preset but I assume either none, 2 , or 4 max.
I assume they are using a Crysis Benchmark, so I do not know what level. Also, my question is still what is better, tri 285 or quad 295?
|
|
![]() |
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE
Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jun 2009 at 6:45pm |
|
I said 3 x 275 cause results will be very very close to 285, I don't have a tri sli chart to show you side by side but here they are as singles next to each other:
Crysis WARHEAD:
now that is at Anti-Aliasing 2x MSAA and ambush level. to answer your question its difficult, cause I'm not sure with new drivers who does better. best bang for your buck is 3 x 275 otherwise I think 3 x 285 in crisis at your resolution of 1900 x 1200 will do best but we are talking only a few fps here but a much higher price. hope that helps Edited by DST4ME - 13 Jun 2009 at 6:46pm |
|
![]() |
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE
Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jun 2009 at 6:52pm |
|
some info on current drivers:
Up to 22% performance increase in Crysis: Warhead with antialiasing enabled so you can expect around 13 - 15 fps on top of what I said earlier if nvidia's claim is right, which was:
Edited by DST4ME - 13 Jun 2009 at 6:53pm |
|
![]() |
|
SuperSoldier1
Newbie
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 57 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jun 2009 at 7:00pm |
|
Ok, but what is the best, tri 285 or quad 295?
|
|
![]() |
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE
Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jun 2009 at 7:21pm |
that was the answer |
|
![]() |
|
SuperSoldier1
Newbie
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 57 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jun 2009 at 7:22pm |
|
Oh, thanks man, thought you were comparing it to the 275 only.
|
|
![]() |
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE
Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jun 2009 at 7:28pm |
|
nah I gave you what you can expect with Tri sli 275, 285 and quad sli 285, if you notice the quad would do the worst.
hope all that helped, I'm guessing you going with Tri sli 285?
|
|
![]() |
|
SuperSoldier1
Newbie
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 57 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jun 2009 at 8:36pm |
|
Yea, seems so.
|
|
![]() |
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE
Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jun 2009 at 8:44pm |
|
oh right then, good luck
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum |