Quad or DualPost Date: 2008-04-02 |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
mlapgw
Newbie
Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 33 |
Quote Reply
Topic: Quad or DualPosted: 02 Apr 2008 at 2:14pm |
|
My knowledge of processors is very limited. I am looking to have a system built similar to the Category 3 - 850si. I was looking at the chioce of processors and noticed two, E8400 and Q6600 cost about the same.
This rig will be for gaming. I play strategy and FPS games. For this purpose which is the better processor for me?
|
|
![]() |
|
Slicer
Groupie
Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 78 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Apr 2008 at 2:17pm |
|
As per Sunfighter in another thread:
"I would of recommended an E8400 instead, but the price difference is only 6 bucks less now. It used to be 44..and while the E8400 gives superior gaming performance right now overclocked vs the overclocked Q6600, it isnt as future proofed as games will start to move towards supporting quad cores. "
Look Sun you're famous I quoted you!!
|
|
![]() |
|
Bill the Cat
DS Veteran
Forum Bitch!
Joined: 27 Aug 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1150 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Apr 2008 at 3:19pm |
|
Reasonable people, in addition to ourselves, can make a case either way. Personally, I don't belived multicore software is going to be available as soon as folks think. The one exception might be in video editing.....
Anyway, I come down on the side of faster dual core CPUs. The majority of folks here seem to fall the other way. No doubt some day they will be right.
|
|
|
3.6 GHz E6850, 4 GB RAM, GTS 250, TJ9, Win 7 64-bit
4.4 GHz i7 3930K, 16 GB RAM, GTX 670, 550D, Win 7 64-bit |
|
![]() |
|
mlapgw
Newbie
Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 33 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Apr 2008 at 3:45pm |
|
I replace my computer about every three years. I wonder if the gaming world will have written software to take advantage of Quad core by then.
|
|
![]() |
|
EdH63
DS Veteran
Joined: 01 Sep 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1826 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Apr 2008 at 3:52pm |
|
Here's how I made my decision. 4 is a bigger number than 2, ergo, I am superior because I have 4 instead of 2.
Sounds reasonable.
|
|
![]() |
|
SunfighterLC
DS Veteran
Joined: 18 Feb 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1527 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Apr 2008 at 4:00pm |
|
Cept you have 4 super models fighting against 2 sumo wrestlers. Honestly though, im kinda happy the prices are fairly similar, it allows the user to decide what they want and need.
Woulda been nice if i coulda got my duo back when it was 44 bucks cheaper though..hehe. I guess the demand is causing its price to spike, i think they underestimated the number of people that would want the E class.
|
|
![]() |
|
EdH63
DS Veteran
Joined: 01 Sep 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1826 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Apr 2008 at 4:06pm |
|
Well, my supermodels are all superdike lesbionic Amazonian dudettes. I wouldn't want to meet one in a dark alley.
What were we talking about? Oh yeah... Kelly! ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Kelly
Senior Member
Digital Storm Customer Service
Joined: 13 May 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 791 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Apr 2008 at 6:02pm |
|
MY god people, how do I alwasy get brought up here??? Between Ed, Edd, and Eddy, BtC, and Franklin, I guess I can always count on being talked about somewhere..
|
|
![]() |
|
EdH63
DS Veteran
Joined: 01 Sep 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1826 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Apr 2008 at 7:15pm |
|
I don't know, bro. You're just fun to bring into the conversation when there needs to be a sexual innuendo spoken or anything having to do with animals, their rear ends and your thumb.
Always remember, you are an official huckleberry and no one can take that away from you. Yeah... uh... that sounds good. |
|
![]() |
|
Bill the Cat
DS Veteran
Forum Bitch!
Joined: 27 Aug 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1150 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Apr 2008 at 8:42pm |
"Tough love!"
|
|
|
3.6 GHz E6850, 4 GB RAM, GTS 250, TJ9, Win 7 64-bit
4.4 GHz i7 3930K, 16 GB RAM, GTX 670, 550D, Win 7 64-bit |
|
![]() |
|
Tyler Lowe
Newbie
Joined: 14 May 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 0 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Apr 2008 at 11:52pm |
|
Sorry to break in on the man love here fellas, but back to topic
,Considering pushing an entry level quad's clocks up past 3.0GHz is the norm at this point, I would hardly call them "supermodels vs. sumo wrestlers". The performance difference is minimal. The games that see an advantage in a faster 2 core setup, are your first person shooters and graphics intensive action based titles. The situation can change somewhat based on resolution, but for most gamers, this holds true. Strategy games and MMO's are more likely to benefit from the quad core. Strategy games will be more likely to adopt multi core support than FPS titles IMHO, but we shall see. One thing that I will be most interested in, is how NVidia adapts the Phys-X technology they recently acquired. I have to wonder if they will make use of a software driver that will soak up some CPU cycles. If the use of Phys-X technology becomes more widespread in game development now that Nvidia has ownership, this may become another reason to go quad over dual core. In my opinion, the primary reason to avoid a core2quad is related to heat and power consuption, not the less than 10% performance difference versus a core2duo in games that make use of only one core. If you go quad, be sure that your cooling selections are up to it. I normally advise maxing out cooling whenever possible anyway, but when you go quad, it becomes much more important. |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum |