Sandy Bridge E Core i7-3960X performance revealedPost Date: 2011-07-25 |
Post Reply
|
Author | |
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply
Topic: Sandy Bridge E Core i7-3960X performance revealed Posted: 25 Jul 2011 at 4:19am |
Sandy Bridge E Core i7-3960X performance revealed early
Although an exact release date for Intel's upcoming X79 chipset and Sandy Bridge E processors remains uncertain, DonanimHaber has revealed some new details about one of the parts. The Turkish site has published some internal slides that compare Intel's existing hexa-core Core i7-990X Extreme Edition processor to the new flagship i7-3960X. Unsurprisingly, the new part is claimed to offer a dramatic speed boost. Despite winding the core clock frequency down from 3.46GHz to 3.30GHz, the i7-3960X actually has a higher peak Turbo Boost speed, revving up to 3.9GHz versus 3.73GHz. The slides also indicate that the new 32nm six-core (12 threads) processor will come with an extra 3MB of cache (15MB versus 12MB). Such a configuration should grant the i7-3960X a solid performance boost while keeping thermal loads in check. In fact, the 3960X is expected to list the same 130W thermal design power as the 990X. Like Intel's other recent Extreme Edition and K series processors, the upcoming Sandy Bridge part will have an unlocked multiplier, giving enthusiasts more flexibility with overclocking. Another key feature is the addition of support for quad-channel DDR3 1333MHz memory, granting the 3960X a substantial increase in memory bandwidth. According to Intel's data, the 3960X is 12-15% quicker than the 990X in Cinebench, POV-Ray, and ProShow Gold. That gap is even larger when comparing their performance in SPEC CPU2006 and Sandra's multimedia and memory bandwidth tests. In the former, the 3960X achieves 34% more integer performance and 64% better floating point results, while it offers double the speed in both Sandra benchmarks. We've seen compelling reports that suggest may not make their originally scheduled August or September debut. Intel is reportedly pushing to ship the new platform before the end of 2011 and rumors suggest that the company may have to downgrade some specifications to make the cut. Namely, the X79 chipset might lose support for PCI Express 3.0 and it will offer four SATA/SAS 6Gb/s ports instead of eight. |
|
maxyme
DS Veteran Joined: 14 Aug 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1514 |
Quote Reply Posted: 25 Jul 2011 at 11:53am |
wow i thought they pushed it back to q1 2012 but maybe not.
|
|
Steam:pcmaster160
|
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply Posted: 25 Jul 2011 at 3:19pm |
Lot of rumors going around, we are waiting to see what comes out and what tech is there and what is missing if any.
they are talking about oct/nov release. |
|
Antis
Newbie Joined: 25 Jul 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 6 |
Quote Reply Posted: 25 Jul 2011 at 4:20pm |
Sick stuff, insane cache on the new extreme cpu. What happen to the idea of the 8-10 core processors?
|
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply Posted: 26 Jul 2011 at 2:01am |
8 core is gonna be server for now, I'm not sure when or if there will be an e or main stream 8 core for sb or ivy, haswell is suppose to have native 8 cores.
But don't worry sometime between 2014 and 2016, you gonna see a 12 core cpu IMHO. Edited by DST4ME - 26 Jul 2011 at 2:02am |
|
Uruvsuurt
Groupie Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 135 |
Quote Reply Posted: 27 Jul 2011 at 2:11pm |
12 cores?!?!??? That just sounds outrageous.
Man....I wonder what would use 12 cores? I mean right now do games and programs on average use 6 or even 4? I thought most programs barely scratched 4 cores? Maybe games will be in virtual 3d worlds then and people will live inside the SIMS all day. |
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply Posted: 27 Jul 2011 at 2:43pm |
Many new apps/games will use multi core/threads, win7 itself supports multi core/threads.
For games and for now over 4 cores is not really needed but soon that will change, everybody is moving toward support for multi core/thread. |
|
SDR
Newbie Joined: 24 May 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 56 |
Quote Reply Posted: 08 Aug 2011 at 1:31pm |
Losing PCI Express 3.0 in the X79 would really suck.
|
|
i7 920 @ 3.8Ghz
Asus P6T-Deluxe 12GB OCZ Platinum 1600 GTX 480 SLI Silverstone ST1500 PS Raven 2 Evolution Case. |
|
Dragoonseal
DS Veteran Joined: 03 Apr 2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2247 |
Quote Reply Posted: 08 Aug 2011 at 3:53pm |
Keep in mind it was never going to have PCIe 3.0 for the GPUs, it was just going to have a x4 or x8 (I forget which) PCIe 3.0 lane for SATA bandwidth to support all the Intel 6Gb/s ports. Even if this is downgraded to a PCIe 2.0 lane it would still take many very expensive SSDs in RAID 0 to tap out its bandwidth, so this shouldn't make an impact on many people. |
|
Lilim
Intel Core i7 920 @4.2GHz HAF 932 - Dual SLI Nvidia GTX 480s 3x Intel X25-M G2 (80GB) SSD RAID0 |
|
pulsedrive
Newbie Joined: 04 Jan 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 62 |
Quote Reply Posted: 15 Aug 2011 at 10:36am |
http://feeds.ziffdavis.com/~r/ziffdavis/extremetech/~3/m5a2RcmR2n0/92760-sandy-bridge-e-cpus-too-hot-for-intel
Interesting read about possible heat issues with the new CPUs. |
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply Posted: 19 Aug 2011 at 6:16pm |
Meh lets wait and see for sure, the tec can fit on it if needed.
|
|
Alex
Admin Group Digital Storm Supervisor Joined: 04 Jun 2012 Online Status: Offline Posts: 16314 |
Quote Reply Posted: 19 Aug 2011 at 8:31pm |
|
|
coolmasta
Groupie Joined: 28 Jan 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 241 |
Quote Reply Posted: 12 Sep 2011 at 7:29pm |
Tom's review. Ya I know its Tom's lol
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/core-i7-3960x-x79-performance,3026-2.html |
|
I7 2600k @ 4.5 Ghz, Noctua D14
8 Gigs Corsair 1600 HAF 922 Evga Gtx 580 |
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply Posted: 12 Sep 2011 at 7:40pm |
but its toms so it does not matter what it says.
|
|
darbebo
Senior Member Joined: 18 Jun 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 515 |
Quote Reply Posted: 29 Sep 2011 at 1:10am |
noob question, what do you mean? My friends told me back in the days Tom's site was good...or was i misinformed?
|
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply Posted: 29 Sep 2011 at 1:25am |
Hugely misinformed, thats the last place you should look.
|
|
darbebo
Senior Member Joined: 18 Jun 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 515 |
Quote Reply Posted: 29 Sep 2011 at 1:31am |
rofl, may i dare ask why!?
|
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply Posted: 29 Sep 2011 at 1:35am |
their benches and the whole site has got bad info, most times they lean to one side, they are just not a creditable place.
not that there is a place that is 100% reliable, but there are few that are most times, its upto us as the readers to be able to tell which bench is done correctly and which may have issues. try anantech, guru3d, hardwareheaven, techpowerup, those are good most times. |
|
Post Reply |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |