VOTE: New Prebuild Video Card OptionPost Date: 2009-08-13 |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
Alex
Admin Group
Digital Storm Supervisor
Joined: 04 Jun 2012 Online Status: Offline Posts: 16314 |
Quote Reply
Topic: VOTE: New Prebuild Video Card OptionPosted: 13 Aug 2009 at 1:24am |
|
We are finishing up specs on our high-end prebuild config, and here is a quick teaser:
HAF 922 i7 920 OC'd to 3.8GHz EVGA X58 Motherboard 6GB 1600MHz (Mushkin/Corsair) 750W PSU 1TB HDD Asetek CPU Liquid Cooler DVDRW Windows Vista Home Pre 64-bit With Windows 7 Coupon Free 3 Year Warranty/Life-time Support Target price: $1,899 Now, should we have either option: A) 1xGTX 295 or B) 2xGTX 275 896MB in SLI |
|
![]() |
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE
Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Aug 2009 at 1:29am |
|
Alex I wish you guys would use a 500GB and Noctua NH-U12P instead, the 2 x 275 gets my vote for sure.
|
|
![]() |
|
Alex
Admin Group
Digital Storm Supervisor
Joined: 04 Jun 2012 Online Status: Offline Posts: 16314 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Aug 2009 at 1:56am |
|
DST4ME,
Thanks for the feedback. We can't change the HDD or the cooling system at the moment. Edited by Alex - 13 Aug 2009 at 2:00am |
|
![]() |
|
Alex
Admin Group
Digital Storm Supervisor
Joined: 04 Jun 2012 Online Status: Offline Posts: 16314 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Aug 2009 at 2:01am |
|
Other question, if we went with the GTX 275's in SLI, would guys mind it in the HAF 922 or do you want it in the HAF 932?
|
|
![]() |
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE
Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Aug 2009 at 3:37am |
|
IMHO 932, specially if its a high-end build
![]() Edited by DST4ME - 13 Aug 2009 at 3:37am |
|
![]() |
|
jean luc picard
Senior Member
Joined: 08 Jun 2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 187 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Aug 2009 at 4:46am |
|
Ive been doing alot of reading in the nvidia forum's and it would seem more
gamer's would prefer the 275's in sli over the 295.
|
|
|
INTEL I7 920 OCED 3.5 GHZ
6 GB DDR3 MUSHKIN RAM 1333 MHZ DUAL GTX 275 SLI 750 WATT PS 500 GB WD HDx2 RAID 0 WINDOW'S VISTA HOME premium ANTEC 902 TOWER ACER 23IN 1920/1080 rez EVGA X58 LE |
|
![]() |
|
justin.kerr
DS Veteran
Joined: 06 May 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 5084 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Aug 2009 at 9:04am |
|
The 1TB drive is vastly superior to the 500Gb, keep the 1Tb. I think that the GTX 295 would be a better solution for the average user. One card solutions have a lot of advantages.
|
|
![]() |
|
Monstromo
Groupie
Joined: 10 Oct 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 214 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Aug 2009 at 11:20am |
|
But isn't the 295 using two GPUs anyway? Also, 1TB is much more attractive than one 500GB drive. If I was to buy a prebuild that little drive option would annoy me.
|
|
|
Pro Case 850W Green Cathode
Intel Quad Q6600 790i Mobo 4GB DDR3 1333 RAM 260 216 OC Video Card 150/150GB 10k Raptor RAID X-Fi Fatal1ty Vista 64Bit Ultimate 22" Samsung |
|
![]() |
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE
Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Aug 2009 at 1:13pm |
|
Monstromo its never a good idea to have a big HDD as your os drive, but I agree with you on the 2 x 275 it out performs the 295.
|
|
![]() |
|
justin.kerr
DS Veteran
Joined: 06 May 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 5084 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Aug 2009 at 2:04pm |
|
The performance difference between 2 275's and a 295's is very minimal, and if you need/want the same performance out of a 295 OC it to 275 specs. One card leaves room for expansion. K.I.S.S. should always be in effect.There is nothing wrong with having a large OS drive. Faster and easier to operate with one drive than multiples.
|
|
![]() |
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE
Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Aug 2009 at 2:09pm |
|
I disagree, multiple drives do not equal slower speeds, fill up that 1TB to 70% and lets see who will be slower in seaches, defrag, backup and etc, you with a 1TB drive full to 70% with your os and files or me with a 500GB with only 20% filled since I keep my files on a second drive. K.I.S.S. is in effect, one HDD has only os/apps/games so that the os drive is kept simple.
dual HDD will allow your OS drive to maintain its speed, your way the HDD speed will decrease as you add more files. in games that don't support sli, you can OC a 275 and kill a 295, K.I.S.S. should always be in effect, its much simpler to run dual 275 stock then to oc a 295. Edited by DST4ME - 13 Aug 2009 at 2:11pm |
|
![]() |
|
Monstromo
Groupie
Joined: 10 Oct 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 214 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Aug 2009 at 2:12pm |
|
Then put in two 500GB drives. That solves it.
|
|
|
Pro Case 850W Green Cathode
Intel Quad Q6600 790i Mobo 4GB DDR3 1333 RAM 260 216 OC Video Card 150/150GB 10k Raptor RAID X-Fi Fatal1ty Vista 64Bit Ultimate 22" Samsung |
|
![]() |
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE
Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Aug 2009 at 2:19pm |
|
Exactly, once for the OS and one for files, so that the OS drive does not lose its performance due to it getting filled up.
however this is pointless as Alex said they can't change the HDD configuration anyways. |
|
![]() |
|
justin.kerr
DS Veteran
Joined: 06 May 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 5084 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Aug 2009 at 2:36pm |
|
Your point is just ridiculous.. Fill up any HDD 70% and it will slow down. At 70% full, the 1TB it is still faster than the 500 empty. So your point is not valid at all. I never said 2 drives were slow, but why have one small, slow drive, or 200 of them. makes no sense. Multiple drives are fine for people that are use to them, but for the average user, keeping things simple is always better. |
|
![]() |
|
DST4ME
DS ELITE
Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 36758 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Aug 2009 at 2:49pm |
|
show me where you see a 1TB faster then a 32MB cache 500GB and how much faster then a 16MB cache.
show me how defraging or scanning a 1TB HDD filles 70% is faster then a 500GB empty. you act like the 1TB defrags or scans read/write, twice as fast as a 500GB which it does not, full or empty. how is losing all your data on one drive (if the drive goes bad) the best option for users? and I don't see how a simple second drive complicates anything, its no different then storing files in a seperate folder. I'm not saying the 1TB is not faster it is, but its not that much faster and once it gets close to filling up it does not have the same performance as it does when its under 70% full. and even tho its a bit faster, it will not go thru 750GB of data faster then a 500GB will go thru 40GB of data. Edited by DST4ME - 13 Aug 2009 at 3:01pm |
|
![]() |
|
Alex
Admin Group
Digital Storm Supervisor
Joined: 04 Jun 2012 Online Status: Offline Posts: 16314 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Aug 2009 at 3:55pm |
|
Done, the winner is 2x GTX 275's in SLI. Thread closed.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum |