FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Welcome to DSO's line up, gtx465

Post Date: 2010-06-06
 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
!ender_ View Drop Down
DS Veteran
DS Veteran


Joined: 24 Oct 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4219 		  Quote !ender_ Quote  Post ReplyReply bullet Topic: Welcome to DSO's line up, gtx465
    Posted: 06 Jun 2010 at 2:45am
http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/
 
looking through it, you get what you pay for, its 20% the price of the 470, and its about the same ratio of performance
 
not overly impressed, i think if they would have gone down another 40-80 bucks they would spark some interest, but at this standpoint, i find it hard to believe anyone would get this instead of saving for a 470


Edited by !ender_ - 06 Jun 2010 at 2:54am
Back to Top
GosuHyunwoo View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 09 Apr 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 200 		  Quote GosuHyunwoo Quote  Post ReplyReply bullet Posted: 06 Jun 2010 at 3:00am
IMO this card should be like the gtx 460..not the gtx 465

Back to Top
Bullseye View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 11 Jan 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 880 		  Quote Bullseye Quote  Post ReplyReply bullet Posted: 06 Jun 2010 at 10:19am
It sorta sucks they said it was mainly for cheap 3d gaming
Back to Top
justin.kerr View Drop Down
DS Veteran
DS Veteran

Email address used to purchase matched with forums account email.

Joined: 06 May 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5084 		  Quote justin.kerr Quote  Post ReplyReply bullet Posted: 06 Jun 2010 at 12:40pm
price to performance ratio is very bad..
Back to Top
Bullseye View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 11 Jan 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 880 		  Quote Bullseye Quote  Post ReplyReply bullet Posted: 06 Jun 2010 at 1:27pm
I hope no one on the forums has bought it yet!!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 4.296875E-02 seconds.