FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Overclocking Non-K Skylake Cpu's possible

Post Date: 2015-12-14

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Ariktu View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie

Email address used to purchase matched with forums account email.

Joined: 21 May 2013
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 492
  Quote Ariktu Quote  Post ReplyReply bullet Topic: Overclocking Non-K Skylake Cpu's possible
    Posted: 14 Dec 2015 at 7:25am
It seems that you can now overclock Non-K cpu's if you have Skylake that is.

http://www.techspot.com/review/1108-intel-locked-skylake-cpu-bclk-overclocking/

Interesting that this can be done.




Back to Top
bprat22 View Drop Down
DS ELITE
DS ELITE

DigitalStorm East -- (Unofficially!)
Email address used to purchase matched with forums account email.

Joined: 08 Jun 2011
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 20391
  Quote bprat22 Quote  Post ReplyReply bullet Posted: 14 Dec 2015 at 7:48am
Interesting for sure.  Thanks for the link.    With the shortage of K Skylakes, this would be a welcome turn of events if Asus and others also jump on it.

I always wonder what the downside would be, but as long as the vcore was held in check, sounds good. 
Back to Top
FrankW View Drop Down
DS Veteran
DS Veteran


Joined: 22 Feb 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2254
  Quote FrankW Quote  Post ReplyReply bullet Posted: 14 Dec 2015 at 8:40am
I would think that all the other motherboard builders will have to follow Asrock's lead. Since it is a BIOS change it wouldn't make sense not to do it. It seems like a lot of motherboard builders are making a lot of changes to their BIOS already. Trying to keep up with Skylake's needs.

Frank

Edited by FrankW - 15 Dec 2015 at 4:20am
Back to Top
db188 View Drop Down
DS Veteran
DS Veteran

Email address used to purchase matched with forums account email.

Joined: 29 Jul 2014
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2115
  Quote db188 Quote  Post ReplyReply bullet Posted: 14 Dec 2015 at 10:39pm
going "old school"!  i wonder if you can do this on other than "Z" board models?
Aventum 3
I7-6700K
Gigabyte G1 Z170X Gaming GT
16GB Corsair Dominator 3000MHz
Corsair Hx1000i 1000W
Samsung M.2 980 Pro 2TB;Samsung 850 EVO 1TB
MSI RTX 3080 Ventus OC 10G LHR
Gigabyte M28U 4K
Back to Top
 View Drop Down
DS Veteran
DS Veteran

Email address used to purchase matched with forums account email.

Joined: 28 Oct 2014
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1674
  Quote  Quote  Post ReplyReply bullet Posted: 15 Dec 2015 at 12:13am
Like Z97? You can't...the base clock on earlier processors (but after first generation Core) was not only tied to the CPU frequency, but also the PCI-e bus and other clock frequencies in the processor and caused significant stability issues with much variance.
Back to Top
db188 View Drop Down
DS Veteran
DS Veteran

Email address used to purchase matched with forums account email.

Joined: 29 Jul 2014
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2115
  Quote db188 Quote  Post ReplyReply bullet Posted: 15 Dec 2015 at 3:47pm
i meant other skylake boards like the H models.
Aventum 3
I7-6700K
Gigabyte G1 Z170X Gaming GT
16GB Corsair Dominator 3000MHz
Corsair Hx1000i 1000W
Samsung M.2 980 Pro 2TB;Samsung 850 EVO 1TB
MSI RTX 3080 Ventus OC 10G LHR
Gigabyte M28U 4K
Back to Top
 View Drop Down
DS Veteran
DS Veteran

Email address used to purchase matched with forums account email.

Joined: 28 Oct 2014
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1674
  Quote  Quote  Post ReplyReply bullet Posted: 15 Dec 2015 at 4:53pm
Back to Top
db188 View Drop Down
DS Veteran
DS Veteran

Email address used to purchase matched with forums account email.

Joined: 29 Jul 2014
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2115
  Quote db188 Quote  Post ReplyReply bullet Posted: 15 Dec 2015 at 9:41pm
good info there.  it still seems like a YMMV case (depending on mobo support for it), but wow, what a blow to the more expensive chips the more this gets out there. i would've thought that much base clock oc'ing would play havoc with stability/memory, but it seems the ddr4 memory actually loves it.

i wonder if Intel will respond to this?  
Aventum 3
I7-6700K
Gigabyte G1 Z170X Gaming GT
16GB Corsair Dominator 3000MHz
Corsair Hx1000i 1000W
Samsung M.2 980 Pro 2TB;Samsung 850 EVO 1TB
MSI RTX 3080 Ventus OC 10G LHR
Gigabyte M28U 4K
Back to Top
bprat22 View Drop Down
DS ELITE
DS ELITE

DigitalStorm East -- (Unofficially!)
Email address used to purchase matched with forums account email.

Joined: 08 Jun 2011
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 20391
  Quote bprat22 Quote  Post ReplyReply bullet Posted: 16 Dec 2015 at 12:56pm
I have to think that Intel will somehow restrict this, either by altering the instructions or "reaching out" to mobo manufacturers.   

I guess the saving grace is that most consumers won't do it themselves anyways, so maybe not the impact it seems.   In our world, we would.

Back to Top
 View Drop Down
DS Veteran
DS Veteran

Email address used to purchase matched with forums account email.

Joined: 28 Oct 2014
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1674
  Quote  Quote  Post ReplyReply bullet Posted: 16 Dec 2015 at 1:21pm
I think the saving grace is that the K processors are now at a higher binning and have higher default clocks now, as opposed to the non-K varieties. So, while you may be able to get more out of the non-K processors, you still won't be able to get as much as a K processor. Also, the Intel Performance Tuning Protection Plan is only available for the K and X processors.

I think if Intel were to do anything more to stop this, it would show that they have confidence that the AMD Zen platform won't be much of a threat. But, if Zen is as good as AMD is making it out to be and is near level competition with the Intel processors, Intel's best move would be to continue allowing this to boost potential performance of their processors and goodwill with the community.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.0625 seconds.